View Poll Results: which one is better...all around
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll
S2000 Or G35c
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 236
From: Dallas/ Ft Worth
I'm gonna say the G35.. I've driven it and the Torque down low really puts the honda to shame.. even though it does have a 1.5L advantage over the S2K... I'm 6'8 and I don't fit in S2Ks.. I've tried to drive them.. got in, drove it off the dealership lot to test drive it, pulled over on the side and traded my dad the drivers seat.. too cramped... The G35 however... Thats kush... It sounds just divine
Super Moderator
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Originally Posted by Dysfnctnl85' date='Jan 14 2004, 05:27 PM
Maybe I am naive, but in my opinion, a high compression ratio is not a substitute for displacement, etc.
inanimate_object, while your example is valid, your reasoning is as ***-backwards as it can get. Striving for less torque because torque is a feature of big heavy cars is the stupidest thing Ive ever read. Speed comes in all weights, and is directly related to the hp to weight ratio. It is also related to the ratio of torque to weight, but gear ratios must be taking into account, so as not to skew the results.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,259
From: Schofield Barracks, HI
Originally Posted by iouri' date='Jan 14 2004, 09:34 PM
s2000...lighter & better handling...looks to die for...
havnt driven one yet but have a test drvei booked for tmrw.
havnt driven one yet but have a test drvei booked for tmrw.
thats the guy
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 570
From: St. Petersburg/Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by tampaFD' date='Jan 14 2004, 05:19 AM
g35. infinity fit and finish is very nice. not as true a sports car as the 2000 but fun and rewarding to drive.
y are you in the market?
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,483
From: Fayetteville, Georgia
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Jan 14 2004, 06:51 PM
Was that actually supposed to help your argument? It didnt work. The simple fact is that you cannot judge how a car drives simply by its torque number. That car feels much more lively that some other cars Ive driven with considerably more torque.
inanimate_object, while your example is valid, your reasoning is as ***-backwards as it can get. Striving for less torque because torque is a feature of big heavy cars is the stupidest thing Ive ever read. Speed comes in all weights, and is directly related to the hp to weight ratio. It is also related to the ratio of torque to weight, but gear ratios must be taking into account, so as not to skew the results.
inanimate_object, while your example is valid, your reasoning is as ***-backwards as it can get. Striving for less torque because torque is a feature of big heavy cars is the stupidest thing Ive ever read. Speed comes in all weights, and is directly related to the hp to weight ratio. It is also related to the ratio of torque to weight, but gear ratios must be taking into account, so as not to skew the results.
Like I said, in my opinion the G35c is a much better car based on not just numbers, but also the tests I've seen and read about.
You don't have to try to rip someone a new one just because they have a different opinion than your own.
Super Moderator
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Originally Posted by Dysfnctnl85' date='Jan 15 2004, 12:31 AM
I think you can predict certain things about a car from numbers, that's all I was doing. I'm not a test driver...and I've never driven either one of these cars.
Like I said, in my opinion the G35c is a much better car based on not just numbers, but also the tests I've seen and read about.
You don't have to try to rip someone a new one just because they have a different opinion than your own.
Like I said, in my opinion the G35c is a much better car based on not just numbers, but also the tests I've seen and read about.
You don't have to try to rip someone a new one just because they have a different opinion than your own.
