rolling stones licked a hairy nutt live at halftime
02-06-2006, 03:44 PM
#21
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Originally Posted by PhoenixDownVII' post='799853' date='Feb 6 2006, 12:56 PM
Never said they were the same age, but at the same time, U2's been around forever and they still have it.
Boxrs (Ant Triangle): Bono's always been an activist, what's so new about that? I think their new album is pretty good considering how long it's been. Sunday Bloody Sunday is an old equivalent to Love & Peace (Or Else), he still sings about the same things, edge still plays similiar clean channel riff's, etc.
But part of that is opinionated, and un-arguable...I just think they're still pretty good considering the stamina of most other bands.
Yah, whatever. The state of their current musicianship aside, I'll always prefer the fun-loving lyrics of the Stones to the blatant political blowhard-ism of Bone-Oh and U frickin' 2. If I want political ******* commentary, I'll read the goddam op-ed page.
02-06-2006, 04:58 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' post='799891' date='Feb 6 2006, 01:44 PM
Yah, whatever. The state of their current musicianship aside, I'll always prefer the fun-loving lyrics of the Stones to the blatant political blowhard-ism of Bone-Oh and U frickin' 2. If I want political ******* commentary, I'll read the goddam op-ed page.
i seriously doubt william f buckley and the national review is a better concert....
http://www.nationalreview.com/
02-06-2006, 06:13 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by nopistons94' post='799921' date='Feb 6 2006, 03:55 PM
bottom line is they need to stop playing, I dont give a **** if they care what I think or not, they are making themselves look bad. There IS a time to retire, and that time is now.
they might keep playing just to **** you off, thats why they are not the beatles
02-06-2006, 07:23 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,871
I don't understand why they didn't get Detroit acts to play the half time show in Detroit. They have an entire genre named after them for Christ sake.
Even if they didn't want Motown, there's still a ton of people to choose from, anyone of which makes more sense than old men from England at America's biggest sporting event.
Detroit people that would be a better choice:
any Motown act,
Bob Seger,
Kid Rock,
M & M,
Madonna,
Ted Nugent. (lol, maybe on guitar for Kid Rock)
Who's picking the halftime show? The Stones (2006), Paul McCartney (2005), Justin Timberlake & Janet Jackson (2004)? Do ANY football fans listen to Timberlake & Jackson? Do any of their fans watch football?
Even if they didn't want Motown, there's still a ton of people to choose from, anyone of which makes more sense than old men from England at America's biggest sporting event.
Detroit people that would be a better choice:
any Motown act,
Bob Seger,
Kid Rock,
M & M,
Madonna,
Ted Nugent. (lol, maybe on guitar for Kid Rock)
Who's picking the halftime show? The Stones (2006), Paul McCartney (2005), Justin Timberlake & Janet Jackson (2004)? Do ANY football fans listen to Timberlake & Jackson? Do any of their fans watch football?
02-06-2006, 08:10 PM
#28
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My BIG ol TURBO-DIESEL
Posts: 5,181
Originally Posted by nopistons94' post='799927' date='Feb 6 2006, 07:38 PM
true the beatles never sucked
BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
YOKO fucked upped John's creativity
and the VEGAN BITCH Linda, did you ever hear that whiney *** bitch sing?
02-07-2006, 09:39 AM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by banzaitoyota' post='799943' date='Feb 6 2006, 06:10 PM
BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
YOKO fucked upped John's creativity
and the VEGAN BITCH Linda, did you ever hear that whiney *** bitch sing?
yeah paul turned into someones mom!