Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

The Piston- Rotary ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #1  
ROTARYROCKET7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,687
From: QUEENS NYC
Default

Popular Mechanics



The radial piston engine long has been recognized as a space-efficient design, and it's been the powerplant of choice for general aviation. A new approach to the radial design—a four-cylinder layout with connecting rods linked to a circular drive-plate type of crankshaft—is being promoted by Markel Motor Espana, a Spanish engineering company. This engine is a radial, but it's also a rotary—the entire cylinder block spins. It's a two-stroke engine, delivering a fuel-air mixture (from a carburetor) through the crankcase into ports adjacent to the cylinders, and it delivers power on each downstroke. The two-stroke cycle reduces vacuum, so there isn't enough vacuum to fill the cylinder. Therefore, the engine is supercharged.















Most conventional engines operate like a bicycle in that pedaling turns the crank and the road wheels. In this engine, however, the power strokes of the pistons impart rotary motion to the crankshaft plate, and the plate transfers rotary motion (through the rods and pistons) to the radial block. Because both the engine block and crankshaft turn, the two transfer power to a common gear drive in a transmission, for a combined power output.

Each cylinder has a spark plug, but because the block spins, there's no wiring directly to the plugs. Instead, this mechanism is much like the free-ride brass-ring holder at the edge of a carousel. As the block rotates, each spark plug passes within 2mm (0.08 in.) of an ignition terminal and the high-voltage electricity "jumps" the small gap to the plug. You can see the external spark as the engine operates.

















The engine resembles a four-stroke in that each cylinder has an overhead exhaust valve operated by a pushrod (from a cam drive on a fixed portion of the engine). And the reaction from the escape of the exhaust gas adds a small amount of rotational "push" to the engine block.

Because the block rotates, it is inherently air-cooled. Of course, the rotating block has to be shielded, and unless a machine has an engine housing (such as a lawnmower), one would have to be added. In addition, there would have to be good isolation of the ignition spark from the exhaust, just in case there was a lot of unburned gasoline in the exhaust stream, such as from a misfire. At this stage, there isn't much of an exhaust system in the design.

















Markel is claiming very high efficiency and what seems like high performance (80 hp from 24 cu. in.). The output actually is reasonable for a supercharged two-stroke, but there's a long way to go to produce a practical powerplant that can meet emission regulations. At this point, all we know for sure is that the experimental engine definitely runs, as was demonstrated at the recent exposition of the Society of Automotive Engineers.

The design is unlike anything we've ever seen, although it combines elements of many engines. In an era in which the two-stroke was given up for dead, the Markel engine demonstrates that there are engineers who think it can come back. The Markel engine is barely out of the womb, and the automobile industry needs sophisticated maturity. Markel recognizes this, and is hoping that engineers with less-demanding applications, such as stationary powerplants, can see enough potential to help with the development.

















Page 1 of 1
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #2  
boxrs4sale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 682
From: Delaware
Default

cool stuff
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:28 AM
  #3  
Srce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

Looks like a wastegate.



Old Mar 2, 2004 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
TyresmokinRx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 875
From: Canberra Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Srce' date='Mar 1 2004, 10:28 PM
Looks like a wastegate.



And a big one at that.
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #5  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

too many moving parts...... hmmm the whole engine spins...



something is bound to break
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #6  
75 Repu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,848
From: Mike is a Liar!
Default

Wierd.
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #7  
rx7_re's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 226
From: Chicago
Default

yea, the whole thing seems kinda unsafe with the exhaust and spark being out in the open like that. Interesting design though.
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #8  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,284
Default

I came up with a design like that in high school. It was based on the Bourke engine. Uh, good for them for making it work.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rowtareh
Suspension, Wheels, Brakes, Tires
4
May 4, 2004 01:33 AM
Revive FD
Insert BS here
23
Mar 5, 2004 01:39 AM
The_7
Insert BS here
5
Aug 14, 2003 11:16 AM
REZN8R
Suspension, Wheels, Brakes, Tires
10
Dec 27, 2002 03:13 PM
Twin89Stangs
Other Cars
24
Dec 28, 2001 06:42 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.