Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

Ok, This Concept Has Been Bugging Me

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2003, 09:55 AM
  #1  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

Ok, with any motor, piston or rotor, non-turbo: I always read where people say that opening up the intake ports allows "more air in" the compustion chamber. If the engine is sucking in the air, how can more air fit in than the maximum displacement? Unless, without porting, there is a negative pressure in the combustion chamber before compression. I mean, if air isn't being forced in (turbo, etc.), how can more air be fit it?



The way I understand it is, with porting there is less restriction, so less work is needed to suck the air in. This would let the power stroke of the cycle put more power to the drivetrain, and use less power to suck in air (among other functions). Just like opening up exhaust allows only for less restriction, not more air to be shoved out of the engine (you can't shove out more than there was to begin with!), right?



Are people just throwing terms around ("more air in") without realizing the actual meaning, or am I misunderstanding something? I'm just trying to grasp this.
Baldy is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 09:58 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
75 Repu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mike is a Liar!
Posts: 4,848
Default

75 Repu is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 10:40 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
DJ Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: teh frozen nort
Posts: 1,030
Default

A less restrictive intake will improve volumetric efficiency, or what percentage of the chamber is actually filled with intake charge. Because of the interaction of pressure waves, and also inertia tuning (both of which involve the length of the intake tract and exhaust header) it is sometimes possible to get more than 100% VE.



Think of it this way: the engine has a limited time to suck in the intake charge. The more restriction, the less it will be able to take in in that time because there is only a limited amount of intake stroke to work with.



So "more air" is actually correct.



J
DJ Rotor is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 10:42 AM
  #4  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

hmmm...interesting



yeah, I just went and read about intake tuning, (edit: www.howstuffworks.com) with the pressure waves and stuff, so I can see how that works



so, with constrictive intake, and no intake tuning...at the close of the intake cycle, before compression, is there actually a negative pressure in the chamber?
Baldy is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Super Moderator

 
banzaitoyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My BIG ol TURBO-DIESEL
Posts: 5,181
Default

There is no such animal as "negative pressure". There is always pressure, may be very little but it does exist
banzaitoyota is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 10:51 AM
  #6  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

Originally Posted by banzaitoyota' date='Apr 10 2003, 10:48 AM
There is no such animal as "negative pressure". There is always pressure, may be very little but it does exist
sorry, I meant less than atmospheric
Baldy is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 11:52 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
DJ Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: teh frozen nort
Posts: 1,030
Default

There is negative gauge pressure, not negative absolute pressure. Gauge pressure is just referenced to atmospheric, and that was what you were thinking of - and you're right about there possibly being a slight negative pressure *gauge* in the chamber at the beginning of the compression stroke - depending on the exhaust flow and port overlap, that is.



J
DJ Rotor is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 12:00 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

ok, I think I've got it straight now. Thanks!
Baldy is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 12:27 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
DJ Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: teh frozen nort
Posts: 1,030
Default

If you want to dig into this stuff get A. Graham Bell's "Four-Stroke Performance Tuning" - very excellent book. No rotary-specific content, but the concepts are mostly the same - especially in areas of intake, exhaust, carburetion, etc



J
DJ Rotor is offline  
Old 04-10-2003, 12:28 PM
  #10  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

if I ever feel the urge to read a book, I'll look for that one
Baldy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eric Happy Meal
Insert BS here
7
03-07-2005 11:55 PM
FDRacing
Insert BS here
7
05-13-2004 01:46 PM
gmonsen
Single Turbo Discussion
31
11-11-2002 04:20 PM
Viper1308
Insert BS here
25
10-21-2002 10:00 AM
Rotarydragon
Insert BS here
13
03-26-2002 10:40 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Ok, This Concept Has Been Bugging Me



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.