dang, i screwed up the link for MTV's response, too late to edit



here is what MTV said:



http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1484738/0...?headlines=true

 

You know what I bet that's the only way they could get away with showing it "Oh it was unreheared" yeah right asshats.

 

oh, and the quote of the year:



"I am sorry if anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance at the Super Bowl," Timberlake said of the incident. "It was not intentional and is regrettable."

 

bullshit... way to cop a rub..

 

Its all a lie to protect them selfs. It was intentional for ratings!!!

Who else walks around with a silver star over there nipple under their clothes?!?! Just like when he grabed her *** in the last concert...just to get the tabloids going!!

 

What's even funnier is even if they made a sad obvious desperate attempt to get the media going about it it would still be front page news:



<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>JACKSON AND TIMERLAKE MAKE DESPERATE ATTEMPT FOR MEDIA ATTENTION</span>

 

so umm... i rip peoples detachable breast covers off all the time ESPECIALLY when they are designed to come off that way on tv

 

Did you see Janet Jackson's respons? There's no way she planned that. She had this "oh ****" response. I think Justin had it planned though... he felt around for a place to grab then ripped it off.

 

Here's a better shot of what happened.

 

From the NYDaily News story:



split-second exposure, witnessed by up to 100 million viewers, revealed what appeared to be a sun-shaped metal ring atop the 37-year-old entertainer's nipple.



http://nydailynews.com/front/story/160626p-140846c.html





I thought it was just a breast petal. guess not. check out the front page's digitally blocked shot of the incident:

http://www.nydailynews.com/ips_rich_...3-home0202.jpg