Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

I Got Another For You Guys

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2003, 09:24 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JT-Imports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,342
Default

Ok check this out....



Company A







COMPANY B COMPANY C



Both company B and C copy COMPANY A's Web page. Company B has been told by COMPANY A

its just fine to copy the web page. COMPANY C, I dont know if they were authorized to copy COMPANY

A's web page.



COMPANY C tells his customers, that COMPANY B, copied off COMPANY C's web page... When

in fact he did what he was authorized to do and COPIED off COMPANY A's web page



Can anyone tell me the answer? As in who is on crack, except me for writing this all

out. I working on filing charges, HARD ball is good, I dont mind... Why dont people just

keep it real, just because I sell FEED or Whatever, doesnt mean I think I own the company

or have rights only prevlidges.



So let me know whats up... Also im running a high fever, so im off to the DOC, so if the spelling

is messed up please forgive hehe
JT-Imports is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

even if company c had the rights to copy company a it gives company c no rights to talk badly and accuse company b of something they do not know happen, nor can prove.



it's either slander or libel one or the other. I know one of them is to say untrue and hurtful things through writing and the other is through speaking/verbal.



both are pretty common lawsuits filed and in the internet's case for the most part it is easy to prove as you have physical evidence.



kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:32 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

also i've been semi-involved in a lawsuit similar to the situation you describe.



oh and i think

libel = written

slander = verbal



but i forget.
teknics is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:39 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JT-Imports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,342
Default

Thanks man, I appreciate the info



COMPANY C was actually a little smart about it, he didnt say the exact

company since without PROOF, it would be no problem to END his

company.



Its just really cheese.... VERY UNTRUE! and backstabbing.



One thing funny, is I asked if they authorized any other companys

to sell/or copy pics off their web page and they said NOPE



OH WELL....



no more energy.... Time for the dreaded DOC
JT-Imports is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

well hope ya feel better



and just push company A to assist you in pressing suit against company c.



technically, im going by US law here dunno if yours are different. Due to company A granting you "ownership" of what you copied from them you have just as much a right to file suit against company C as company A does. Of course the case will go no where without support from company A though.



kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 01-12-2003, 09:43 PM
  #6  
Super Moderator
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Default

i'm confused now its too late. get the bastards JT! you can do it!
vosko is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nopistons94
Other Cars
32
04-22-2006 08:37 PM
1Revvin7
2nd Generation Specific
20
04-05-2003 06:34 AM
ROTARYROCKET7
Kills
20
02-05-2003 11:50 PM
dysthymia
Insert BS here
46
10-22-2002 02:41 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: I Got Another For You Guys



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.