Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

How long ago did I predict this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2002, 03:39 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
9BASE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Default

You guys are geeks.



























j/k



I love you computer ****!!
9BASE3 is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 03:54 PM
  #12  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
phinsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Default

I throw this **** out here just to **** RD off, sad thing is I am pretty sure he knows it cause he stays off the topic until he just can't take it anymore. He waited a while this time, he's usually quicker.



I'll have to come up with something a little more "off the charts" next time.
phinsup is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 04:04 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
9BASE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Default

Haha.. Phins you rock. :mullet:
9BASE3 is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 04:32 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Rotarydragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Close enough to annoy you.
Posts: 1,381
Default

Originally Posted by phinsup' date='Sep 30 2002, 03:32 PM
I doubt that MS is going to get much into hardware, however the next office is already being tested in house and will be a very small install, you will have to be connected to the internet to download the remaining install files. Basically the install gives you the ok to install them and a key.



Ummm, dunno if you read that anywhere


Acutally I knew about that or at least the concept for it, they've been heading that way for some time now The real question will be a network level install, it'll bomb if they won't allow it. Plus the acceptance of broadband...



I'm guessing that about half of palladium will come out and the other half will not. Some of the ideas behind it are good and very workable, the rest are getting to close to the privacy line and the goverment will put a stop to all of that too many eyes. Otherwise, Microsoft has the right to protect it's software just as anyone else does.



The idea that you won't be able to run anything that's not MS approved is totally rediculous. Sounds like something Stallman would come up with.





Microsoft isn't going to do something that's going to **** off almost everyone using their systems.
Rotarydragon is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:55 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
dysthymia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Default

Originally Posted by Rotarydragon' date='Sep 30 2002, 07:32 AM
Sounds like something Stallman would come up with.
No doubt there, Stallman and his crew are total zealots that make the rest of the Linux community look bad.



One thing though, no one is going to force anyone to upgrade to this new stuff, whether it is intrusive or not. I've been using an AMD K6-2 500 system for quite a while with a legitimate copy of Windows 2000 Pro and Office 2000 Pro. I feel no need to upgrade because my system does everything I want it to do. The only people out there that have a compelling need to upgrade are gamers that need to stay on the leading edge of performance to play all the latest games.
dysthymia is offline  
Old 09-30-2002, 07:57 PM
  #16  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
phinsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Default

You say that now, but businesses that won't be able to open new Office.net documents because they are running an older incompatible version will ultimately be forced to upgrade.
phinsup is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mabii
Northwest
12
07-20-2006 12:21 AM
SoRRoW
Insert BS here
10
10-21-2002 05:56 AM
Rob x-7
Insert BS here
0
07-08-2002 08:25 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: How long ago did I predict this?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.