Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

******* Terrorists

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2005, 02:03 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

They're pretty sure the group responsible for the London bombings is the european branch of Al Qaeda - does that mean you're going to wage a war against us now?



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:07 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
rfreeman27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fredneck MD
Posts: 4,107
Default

[quote name='inanimate_object' date='Jul 8 2005, 02:03 PM']They're pretty sure the group responsible for the London bombings is the european branch of Al Qaeda - does that mean you're going to wage a war against us now?



Mark

[snapback]735668[/snapback]

[/quote]





Ha ha ha



Mabye if england was a little tighter stuff liek this wouldnt happen. The governemnt knew there were al qaeda cells in england, yet the did not do anything about it. . .
rfreeman27 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:13 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

What's so funny? It's exactly what you did in Iraq. And really what do you know about how England treat their security? Scotland Yard is world renowned for it's effectiveness.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:20 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
rfreeman27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fredneck MD
Posts: 4,107
Default

i dont see tony blair going out and gassing the civilians....
rfreeman27 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:36 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, NY
Posts: 635
Default

Ask Sweet7, about Terrorism and hostility in Iraq. While it may not be directly linked to 911, it is a place of hatred and actually the ability to build weapons (not all in one place, like one WMD, but scattered parts and factories). Again, ask someone who's been to Iraq long enough.



Pre-911 idea would be to ignore it, but now we simply can't. *shrug*



The whole mess is a lot more complex than saying its all about one idea, threat, person, etc.
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 04:01 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
sweet7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stacked outside you're trailer door
Posts: 1,430
Default

I have personally seen evidence of WMDs in Iraq. Just because there aren't 40,000 warheads laying all over the country with Sarin and Anthrax in them dosent mean they dont/didnt exsist. The US military found large quanities of already manufactured Chemical and Biological agents in Iraq. What seperates that from a WMD? About an hour of work....



As far as the lack of link between Iraq and Al-Qaeda? Well I've personally put flexi-cuffs on Al-Qaeda members IN IRAQ. But then again, what do i know?



Not really trying to start a debate. Just trying to show you guys, through the expereiences of a soldier, that yes, Iraq was a threat to the stability of the Middle-East, the USA, and ultimately the World.



Both sides of our government have fucked up in this incident. I do believe the US jumped into Iraq without an exit strategy, which is nipping us in the butt right now. I also believe that the US military top-brass didnt take into account that it would take more troops to occupy the country then to conquer it. On the other hand, I think that having the liberals say that there were no WMDs in Iraq, Al-Qaeda was not linked to Iraq, and that basically Iraq was not a threat is a major load of bullshit.
sweet7 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 04:10 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
rfreeman27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fredneck MD
Posts: 4,107
Default

[quote name='sweet7' date='Jul 8 2005, 04:01 PM']

Both sides of our government have fucked up in this incident. I do believe the US jumped into Iraq without an exit strategy, which is nipping us in the butt right now. I also believe that the US military top-brass didnt take into account that it would take more troops to occupy the country then to conquer it. On the other hand, I think that having the liberals say that there were no WMDs in Iraq, Al-Qaeda was not linked to Iraq, and that basically Iraq was not a threat is a major load of bullshit.

[snapback]735704[/snapback]

[/quote]





It is only them using it as a tool to bash Bush. ******* people carrying out their own agendas, they cant look at the big picture.
rfreeman27 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 04:29 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Lol I think this is one of those times we need to agree to disagree - I've already said more than my share.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 04:49 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
 
rfreeman27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fredneck MD
Posts: 4,107
Default

[quote name='inanimate_object' date='Jul 8 2005, 04:29 PM']Lol I think this is one of those times we need to agree to disagree - I've already said more than my share.



Mark

[snapback]735712[/snapback]

[/quote]



mkay
rfreeman27 is offline  
Old 07-08-2005, 05:17 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
CrassFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 516
Default

i love you ******s =D
CrassFC3S is offline  


Quick Reply: ******* Terrorists



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.