Just thought I would show you guys the specs of the current fastest pro-street rotary in the world.



And best of all, it is an Aussie car (just to stir you U.S boys... :tounge: :sigh: )



Mazfix Series 6 20b



Runs no intercooler too!

I disagree, I would say the fastest 3 rotor pro street in the world. Remember a 3 rotor is much larger in engine displacement in comparising to your 2 rotor. Somewhere in a little island they had a real nice Pro Street Rx3 I mean "Pro Street" and a ran a best E.T. of 8.20 @166mph on a 2 rotor engine no nitrous, the one day they used nitrous,sad to say they had a bad accident and totaled the Rx3. I think when you start to say "fastest Pro Street in the world" you have to remember there is a (class )difference for everycar.

That RX-3 is in Turbo magazine May issue. Real budget car too, STREET PORTED, homemade mechanical fuel injection, no intercooler, no electronic engine management system.

Rob your talking about Carlos Gonzales from florida, that Rx3 has ran a best ET of 8.4 ..and that Rx3 is gutted. The one I'M talking about has a full interior,working windows, factory dash, all it's original metal e.g. hood,fenders,doors, etc. no fiber glass, and blasted 8.20 know that is the fastest 2 rotor "Pro Street" in the world..

ACk, here I thought you were talking about the other one. I knew it ran a 8.4 too, but thought maybe he had run it faster since then. I stand corrected Judge! Since youre on- if I take my pre-cat pipe off today using my friends lift, would it be ok to run the car IF I HAVE TO to move it off the lift without the pipe in place while Im getting a catalytic converter welded on???

As long as u don't remove the exhaust manifold your ok to turn it on with out your pre-cat. I'ts going to be loud but so what https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png ...

Thanks for the info, just wanted to make sure I wasnt going to burn something up or some ****

well I disagree as the pro street rotary class is any rotary powered vehicle (engine spec) no matter what displacement, whether its a 10a or 26t, in Australia they are all in the same category, plus the series 6 still runs factory dash, and working windows, we also have an r100 that runs 8.1's which is a 13b, its hard to put them all under the same "sub-heading" but as far as rotaries go, I think the car with the time (within reason), is the one to beat....

That is a nice run...however, I still give the best credit to Abel Abarra and his TOYO tires sponsored 3rd gen...I mean...he's running like 7.8s and such...I believe he has switched over to a 3 rotor himself and is looking to be the first to brakethrough 200MPH...Sigel Racing's 20B rx7 is also another good rotary..I believe he ran a 7.3 or 7.4 once....

Oh yea...I was looking at some of Mazfix's performance parts...their turbo accessories, like the boost controllers and the BOVs look a LOT like the Australian company TurboXS...any reason on that? Are they the same company w/ a different name for US and Australian markets?

That's the problem, a separation of engine displacement is not avaiable, there is no way every group of engine(2,4,6,8 cil. 2 and 3 rotor) should be in the same class. But we don't need a separation of (class) to know that a well built and well tuned 3 rotor engine makes more power then your 2 rotor engine. In my opinion you have to realize that when you put a 10A,12A,13B,20B in the same class and claime the 20B is fastest that is only expected. Ok what if I tell you that Siguel Racing from P.R. ran 7.3 with his 20B what are you going to say? the first thing your going to say is "that FD is a full chassis car" well know you start to see what I'M talking about.. I forgot to mention last time, P.R. has a total "Pro Street" first generation Rx7 running 8.15 and weight is 2300lbs on a 2 rotor engine.. Anthony Rodriques from your country knows exactly the car Im talking about...

I know the car too, but dont you think they should have separate 2and3 rotor classes?, but to answer rotaryman's question, the products are "turbosmart," I wasnt aware they were released as turbo xs in the u.s? have you got there u.s website so I can check to see if they have the same products??

I know the car too, but dont you think they should have separate 2and3 rotor classes?, but to answer rotaryman's question, the products are "turbosmart," I wasnt aware they were released as turbo xs in the u.s? have you got there u.s website so I can check to see if they have the same products??

The fact that we have a 2 rotor and a 3 rotor in the same class has simply amazed me. Yes we need to separate the 2 rotors and the 3, put your 2 rotor vs 4 cil. in one class and your 3 rotor vs 6 cil. in another class is just that simple. But the problem doesn't only exist in Australia, here in the USA we have the NHRA running 2 rotor's 3 rotor's 4 cil. 6 cil. 8 cil ALL in the same class(Pro Import) that is the craziest thing NHRA has ever done. I have writting so many letters of dissaproval to the NHRA. Abel(Flaco) Ibarra has had a meeting with them about this separation of class, and they wont budge "yet" but soon they will. When NHRA starts to realize the sponsors are not making any money, is only a matter of time until they start to listen. Now we have a couple of different import drag racing sanctioning body's one is IDRC and NOPI, Nopi has divided the 2 rotor vs 4 cil and your 3 rotor vs 6 cil. this is the begining of some organized import drag racing, because up to this point we have a dissaster as far as what is a fair class for every type of engine application..

I doubt the NHRA really cares what we think because in their redneck eyes all we are is a bunch of little wanna be asians who don't know what the hell we are talking about. Ito you of all people should know that imports can't be as fast as billy's pappy's brother's cousin's uncle's wife's sister's v8. Come on now https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...DIR#>/wink.png

Man you made me :newlaugh:

I saw Abel run a 7.48 @ 176 at Englishtown with the 2 rotor in. I wonder if he's gone faster since... That was about the best race I've ever seen. It was actually USA vs. PR and rotary vs. piston. I can't remember the name of the piston car, I just know it was a Toyota and ran in the low 8's. As for the 200mph barrier, I don't know how a rotary or 4 banger is going to do it in the 1/4. I mean, the cars are so light as is, they practically take flight.