DISGUSTING!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,960
From: Gulf Breeze, FL; ATL, Ga; Bucyrus, Oh
Originally Posted by phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?
omghi2u
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,259
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 12:34 PM
Who cares about sex man.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,620
From: transylvania
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM
[quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,960
From: Gulf Breeze, FL; ATL, Ga; Bucyrus, Oh
Originally Posted by bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM
[quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,620
From: transylvania
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:39 PM
[quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.[/quote]
u must not have good sex. all the girls i **** just want it all the time
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24,416
From: Stuart, FL
So you would expect two people to stay together even though every aspect of their life is not fulfilled? That will ulitmately be an unhappy marriage. Both maile and female should be happy in every aspect or something is not right. Granted there will be times when you are unhappy, times when you are depressed, times when you argue, but that should only accentuate the positive aspects of your relationship, saying that a man or a woman should stay in a relationship if they are not sexually satisfied would be like expecting someone to stand in front of a truck when they had the oppotunity to jump out of the way.
Equivilating wanting a fullfilling sex life to "that is all we think about" is saying I don't deserve to be happy.
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Equivilating wanting a fullfilling sex life to "that is all we think about" is saying I don't deserve to be happy.
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24,416
From: Stuart, FL
As for the "giant part' every part in my opinion is a "giany part". every aspect has to be pleasing or you shouldn't be in a relationship. It's like going to a movie you know you hate, why pay the ticket price.
