DISGUSTING!
10-08-2002, 02:50 PM
#92
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: transylvania
Posts: 3,620
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:49 PM
[quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:48 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:46 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM']
So you would expect two people to stay together even though every aspect of their life is not fulfilled? That will ulitmately be an unhappy marriage. Both maile and female should be happy in every aspect or something is not right. Granted there will be times when you are unhappy, times when you are depressed, times when you argue, but that should only accentuate the positive aspects of your relationship, saying that a man or a woman should stay in a relationship if they are not sexually satisfied would be like expecting someone to stand in front of a truck when they had the oppotunity to jump out of the way.
No, but you shouldn't rely on sex to be your only objective towards a relationship.
I think earlier in this thread, I read that bigtime I believe, was gonna **** this one girl, but because she was a virgin, he thought she wasn't going to be good enough for him.
People learn, if you're a virgin, of course you won't be experienced in ****....
Be relying on sex to go about a relationship is totally absurb.(sp?)
Equivilating wanting a fullfilling sex life to "that is all we think about" is saying I don't deserve to be happy.
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Again, sex isn't everything about a relationship. Sure, you can make the best out of it, to make you "fillfull" your happiness, but isn't there anything else besides sex you can think about to make a relationship happy? I'm sure there is, but you just want to be indenial.[/quote]
sex is the cornerstone of a relationship.... but then again ive never been in one... so sex is the cornerstone of my random sexual experiences[/quote]
Isn't that why you always get hoes and ***** to **** you every night? I assume you're proud of getting laid by them huh? Yeah, i kinda figured you haven't been in a real relationship by the way you respond in this thread.[/quote]
im 17 what the **** am i gonna gain from a relationship besides steady sex? and no i dont get girls to **** me every night i havent had sex in a very very long time
10-08-2002, 02:53 PM
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL; ATL, Ga; Bucyrus, Oh
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:48 PM
[quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:47 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:44 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:42 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:39 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.[/quote]
u must not have good sex. all the girls i **** just want it all the time[/quote]
guess what they are called? ***** and *****s.
I am fine with sex, but listen ...
I don't just dread on sex 24/7. I don't make a relationship be "sex related" all the time. It gets boring, IMO. Call me werid, but does it look like I care? Sex is not all about having a relationship......[/quote]
like i said... the guys u **** must suck at sex.... a womens sex drive is stronger than a mans at most times ( at least it is for the ones tha get good sex)[/quote]
wrong. go back to playing with your legos.[/quote]
seriously u must not be broken in enough or ur a virgin... girls LOVE sex[/quote]
Man little boy. When in God's name did I ever say I never liked sex? You, sir need to read ******* clearer before you comment on anything I say.
1. I like sex
2. I don't look for a hot guy I see down the street and ask him to **** me to get pleasure.
3. relationships are not just about having sex. Grow up.
4. Having a girl, and not caring anything else but sex, rather than a real relationship is just absolute pathetic. IF you want to just have a **** buddy to give you pleasure, go call in for a prositute, as seeing you just want to **** anything your ***** jumps for....
5. I think you are a full breed virgin. You appear like you know everything, but in reality you don't know what the **** you're talking about, but trying to look cool on a freaking online message board.
Just beacuse I disagree with having a relationship about someone you care so much for, of not wanting sex 24/7 doesn't mean i'm a deprived little child.
10-08-2002, 02:54 PM
#94
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: transylvania
Posts: 3,620
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:53 PM
[quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:48 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:47 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:44 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:42 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:39 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.[/quote]
u must not have good sex. all the girls i **** just want it all the time[/quote]
guess what they are called? ***** and *****s.
I am fine with sex, but listen ...
I don't just dread on sex 24/7. I don't make a relationship be "sex related" all the time. It gets boring, IMO. Call me werid, but does it look like I care? Sex is not all about having a relationship......[/quote]
like i said... the guys u **** must suck at sex.... a womens sex drive is stronger than a mans at most times ( at least it is for the ones tha get good sex)[/quote]
wrong. go back to playing with your legos.[/quote]
seriously u must not be broken in enough or ur a virgin... girls LOVE sex[/quote]
Man little boy. When in God's name did I ever say I never liked sex? You, sir need to read ******* clearer before you comment on anything I say.
1. I like sex
2. I don't look for a hot guy I see down the street and ask him to **** me to get pleasure.
3. relationships are not just about having sex. Grow up.
4. Having a girl, and not caring anything else but sex, rather than a real relationship is just absolute pathetic. IF you want to just have a **** buddy to give you pleasure, go call in for a prositute, as seeing you just want to **** anything your ***** jumps for....
5. I think you are a full breed virgin. You appear like you know everything, but in reality you don't know what the **** you're talking about, but trying to look cool on a freaking online message board.
Just beacuse I disagree with having a relationship about someone you care so much for, of not wanting sex 24/7 doesn't mean i'm a deprived little child.
again... im 17... what do i gain from a relationship?
10-08-2002, 02:55 PM
#95
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 12:46 PM
[quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM']
So you would expect two people to stay together even though every aspect of their life is not fulfilled? That will ulitmately be an unhappy marriage. Both maile and female should be happy in every aspect or something is not right. Granted there will be times when you are unhappy, times when you are depressed, times when you argue, but that should only accentuate the positive aspects of your relationship, saying that a man or a woman should stay in a relationship if they are not sexually satisfied would be like expecting someone to stand in front of a truck when they had the oppotunity to jump out of the way.
No, but you shouldn't rely on sex to be your only objective towards a relationship.
I think earlier in this thread, I read that bigtime I believe, was gonna **** this one girl, but because she was a virgin, he thought she wasn't going to be good enough for him.
People learn, if you're a virgin, of course you won't be experienced in ****....
Be relying on sex to go about a relationship is totally absurb.(sp?)
Equivilating wanting a fullfilling sex life to "that is all we think about" is saying I don't deserve to be happy.
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Do you believe that a relationship is only one happy person at a time?
Again, sex isn't everything about a relationship. Sure, you can make the best out of it, to make you "fillfull" your happiness, but isn't there anything else besides sex you can think about to make a relationship happy? I'm sure there is, but you just want to be indenial.[/quote]
Again see, you are focusing on very small portion of my post. Would you stay with someone whom you couldn't stand to listen? Well I expect you to cause there is more to a relationship then just listening? That is rediculous. It's all part of the package, call me picky, but EVERY aspect of the relationship should 100% or the two people shouldn't be together, it is assinine to think that people would stay together and expect the other half to be miserable just because.
LOL in denial, how many times have you been married? This school of thought will only get you into a long unhappy relationship. First off you can't change a person, if you don't love them and love the faults you shouldn't be together. Secondly, if there is one thing that makes you unhappy, at first it may only be a small thing, but it eats at you and pretty soon it becomes the only thing you focus on.
A lot of woman, seem to feel that a relationship should hurt. It should be a lot work, it should make them unhappy. It's like saying he beats me because he loves me.. does that makes sense? We don't have sex because she loves me.... ok.
10-08-2002, 02:57 PM
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL; ATL, Ga; Bucyrus, Oh
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:54 PM
[quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:53 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:48 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:47 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:44 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:42 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:39 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.[/quote]
u must not have good sex. all the girls i **** just want it all the time[/quote]
guess what they are called? ***** and *****s.
I am fine with sex, but listen ...
I don't just dread on sex 24/7. I don't make a relationship be "sex related" all the time. It gets boring, IMO. Call me werid, but does it look like I care? Sex is not all about having a relationship......[/quote]
like i said... the guys u **** must suck at sex.... a womens sex drive is stronger than a mans at most times ( at least it is for the ones tha get good sex)[/quote]
wrong. go back to playing with your legos.[/quote]
seriously u must not be broken in enough or ur a virgin... girls LOVE sex[/quote]
Man little boy. When in God's name did I ever say I never liked sex? You, sir need to read ******* clearer before you comment on anything I say.
1. I like sex
2. I don't look for a hot guy I see down the street and ask him to **** me to get pleasure.
3. relationships are not just about having sex. Grow up.
4. Having a girl, and not caring anything else but sex, rather than a real relationship is just absolute pathetic. IF you want to just have a **** buddy to give you pleasure, go call in for a prositute, as seeing you just want to **** anything your ***** jumps for....
5. I think you are a full breed virgin. You appear like you know everything, but in reality you don't know what the **** you're talking about, but trying to look cool on a freaking online message board.
Just beacuse I disagree with having a relationship about someone you care so much for, of not wanting sex 24/7 doesn't mean i'm a deprived little child.
again... im 17... what do i gain from a relationship?[/quote]
You need to look harder to realize what you gain from a relationship than just sex.
You seem to not comprehend. I understand fully though. You're one of those punk *** kids who beats up on other guys for going out with their ex... ha, as stated as above.
You will not understand a relationship, evar. Until you get the thoughts of just finding a girl to screw outta ya head.
I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but you appear it as the only thing a relationship has to offer. I feel sorry for the women you marry.
10-08-2002, 02:59 PM
#99
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: transylvania
Posts: 3,620
Originally Posted by christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:57 PM
[quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:54 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:53 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:48 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:47 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:44 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:42 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:40 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:39 PM'][quote name='bigtime1148' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:37 PM'][quote name='christi' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:34 PM'][quote name='phinsup' date='Oct 8 2002, 02:16 PM']
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
That established... and fairly un-arguable as far as I am concerned, it would be nieve (spelling is off there) for you not to think that at some point in time this guy plans on hizzin the skizzin's, right?
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
OK, now this is an interesting topic you bring about here. So let's figure this out, you are slightly misinformed, first off men go out with women and respectively women with men because they have some sexual attraction.. what am I saying, well you walk up to me and ask me out on a date and my stomach starts to churn then my answer is no, you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle... I'll pick you up 8.
"you want up to my an my nuts start to tingle.."? I got the nuts part, but the first part means what?
Sure, you're right. You meet someone, both lay eye contact, you hit it the first night of having fun... Good for you. Props to you. I'm not saying that's horribly worng.
OK so no we have established, A) we wouldn't be talking to eachother if we weren't both attracted to eachother. B) we are eventually going to decide that we can't stand each other or we are going to hit it.
Now, the only argument left is whether or not there should be some waiting period correct?
A. You are absolutely correct, I never said that wasn't true.
B. True, but most men, thinking once you get into a relationship it's all about sex, that is NOT TRUE.
Okay.. so ya... correct on the argument, but most men seduce a female into starting something early that they don't want too. Not entirely rape, per se, because I'm not speaking of that...but to an extent of they are giving up trying to tell you no.... because you're getting frustrated by their answers.
OK, so I could spend my money taking this woman out for months and months, to finally get her into the sack only to find out she is terrible lay and even though she has a great personality I am going to ultlimately be looking for another mate... or we could get that done with in the first week or two and get on with the remaining courting process?
Which is more fair to both parties? To spend months not knowing whether or not you have any future or to get it done with and move on?
IMHO?
Who cares about sex man. If you enjoyed her without doing the sack, then well, you know what the answer it. Why will you look for another mate because she is horrible in bed? My point extactly. All you seem to care about in this thread is the fact that if she's good in bed, you're gonna keep her, if she isn't you're off to look for another mate to keep your ***** company.
When you say future..... what extactly do you mean? What kinda future? A family? or a **** buddy?[/quote]
sex is a GIANT part of a relationship ask ANY phyciatrist[/quote]
I never said it isn't. But you appear it's the only way to have a girl. You can find other activities that are alot of fun, than just sex.[/quote]
u must not have good sex. all the girls i **** just want it all the time[/quote]
guess what they are called? ***** and *****s.
I am fine with sex, but listen ...
I don't just dread on sex 24/7. I don't make a relationship be "sex related" all the time. It gets boring, IMO. Call me werid, but does it look like I care? Sex is not all about having a relationship......[/quote]
like i said... the guys u **** must suck at sex.... a womens sex drive is stronger than a mans at most times ( at least it is for the ones tha get good sex)[/quote]
wrong. go back to playing with your legos.[/quote]
seriously u must not be broken in enough or ur a virgin... girls LOVE sex[/quote]
Man little boy. When in God's name did I ever say I never liked sex? You, sir need to read ******* clearer before you comment on anything I say.
1. I like sex
2. I don't look for a hot guy I see down the street and ask him to **** me to get pleasure.
3. relationships are not just about having sex. Grow up.
4. Having a girl, and not caring anything else but sex, rather than a real relationship is just absolute pathetic. IF you want to just have a **** buddy to give you pleasure, go call in for a prositute, as seeing you just want to **** anything your ***** jumps for....
5. I think you are a full breed virgin. You appear like you know everything, but in reality you don't know what the **** you're talking about, but trying to look cool on a freaking online message board.
Just beacuse I disagree with having a relationship about someone you care so much for, of not wanting sex 24/7 doesn't mean i'm a deprived little child.
again... im 17... what do i gain from a relationship?[/quote]
You need to look harder to realize what you gain from a relationship than just sex.
You seem to not comprehend. I understand fully though. You're one of those punk *** kids who beats up on other guys for going out with their ex... ha, as stated as above.
You will not understand a relationship, evar. Until you get the thoughts of just finding a girl to screw outta ya head.
I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but you appear it as the only thing a relationship has to offer. I feel sorry for the women you marry.[/quote]
ive never been in a fight in my life.... and i dont try to "Act cool" on a message board......i know im cool i dont have to act that way... geez... and this isnt a message board is my family... i talk to these guy smore than i talk to my mom