Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

Did You Know That..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #21  
GreyGT-C's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,436
From: Disclaimer: posts made after 11AM are most likely alcohol induced. Please disregard unless very funn
Default

i wanna get a Pacer and build the back into an aqarium so my fish can cruise with me....
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #22  
1988RedT2's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,535
From: VA
Default

[quote name='89 Rag' date='Mar 14 2005, 04:03 PM']I was under the impression that it was fuel consumption/lack of efficiency that kept the rotary engine out of other automobile manufacturer's projects

[snapback]685672[/snapback]

[/quote]



I agree. Clearly, it was higher fuel consumption that killed the widespread rotary development which was taking place on the eve of the 1973 oil embargo. Emissions were also becoming more of a concern to the EPA, so that didn't help the rotary's cause.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #23  
defprun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,016
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Default

late 70's meant the end of the musclecar and the beginning of many fine dodge products that unfortunately still grace our fine roads
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #24  
Eric Happy Meal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 983
From: redondo beach
Default

seems like every company had plans with the rotary, just none could get the damn thing to work.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #25  
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 635
From: Orange County, NY
Default

[quote name='Eric Happy Meal' date='Mar 15 2005, 01:21 AM']seems like every company had plans with the rotary, just none could get the damn thing to work.

[snapback]685943[/snapback]

[/quote]



Indeed. Most stood shocked with the exact face your avatar implies...simply astounding!
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #26  
Tom93R1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 265
From: PHX
Default

[quote name='Jeff20B' date='Mar 14 2005, 11:37 AM']I doubt the reasons conjectured above are the full story. What about the big one; emissions?

[snapback]685622[/snapback]

[/quote]



Actually, back in the early 70's when emissions standards were first coming into play the Mazda rotaries were exceptional on emissions because of the thermal reactor. Compared to free flowing piston motors rotaries were green.
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #27  
Sinful7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,985
From: Denver, CO
Default

[quote name='Tom93R1' date='Mar 15 2005, 12:21 PM']Actually, back in the early 70's when emissions standards were first coming into play the Mazda rotaries were exceptional on emissions because of the thermal reactor. Compared to free flowing piston motors rotaries were green.

[snapback]686134[/snapback]

[/quote]

what killed it then? EPA fuel economy standards?
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #28  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

[quote name='Sinful7' date='Mar 15 2005, 02:24 PM']what killed it then? EPA fuel economy standards?

[snapback]686141[/snapback]

[/quote]



I believe it was durability and cooling issues
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #29  
Sinful7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,985
From: Denver, CO
Default

[quote name='Rob x-7' date='Mar 15 2005, 03:03 PM']I believe it was durability and cooling issues

[snapback]686261[/snapback]

[/quote]

NO!!!
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #30  
defprun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,016
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Default

GASP?! I thought 1.3s were good on gas, easy to cool and lasted forever!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.