saw it yesterday, and having read the book i thought they did a good job with the movie, if anything it was a little cory at a couple of parts

 

I've heard opposite from people who have read the book (BTW i read it and absolutely loved it). I don't plan on going to the movies to see it.



Did they miss out on anything important or mess things up from the book? Is Sofie hott?

 

i have read the book as well and honestly can't see tom hanks playing langdon. I mean tom hanks can't even act, so i don't see how he could pull of any part besides one where he plays his usual character.

 

Whoa, you're the first person I've heard of not liking Tom Hanks. I think he's quite talented, changes his speach and mannerisms to match the character. Compare him to other big-time stars, and they all suck.



I like the Da Vinci Code, but I didn't read the book. But then again, I just love going to see movies, so my standards are pretty loose when it comes to that.

 

well i guess it beats a another sleepless in seattle, you've got mail flixk with melanie griffith..... doesn't get much worse then that.

 

Ok, yes, those do suck. I'm thinking of like Cast Away, The Terminal, Polar Express, ummm can't think of more right at the moment.

 

yea i didnt like any of those.

 

after reading to book then seeing the film...was a little let down...Ron Howard did change some things, and had him doing some things that he didn't do in the book..and yes the woman who played Sophie is HOT!...

The seen in the musieum could have been done so much better..in the book lots of tension..the move FLAT!

 

u wanna talk about someone good at manurisms look at johnny depp, i've seen him in roles where you can barely tell who the hell it is.



I could talk to a volley ball for 4 hours and i have no acting skills.

 

Depp plays some strange parts