Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

Anyone Read the "GIVE ACT", headed to the senate.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2009, 10:54 AM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Originally Posted by phinsup' post='918896' date='Mar 23 2009, 10:57 AM
While I believe Baldy has a very good point, would it not behoove us to; rather then force young americans into some form of gov't service, to take a look at WHY young americans are not signing up for things like the military and volunteer organizations? What has changed in America from the days prior to WWI when young americans willfully and proudly joined the armed forces and prior to the draft (est 1940)? Maybe taking a look at the problem and attempting to solve it would serve our country better then ignoring the root problem and finding a "workaround".



What I am saying is, that maybe we would be better served instilling patriotism that leads to voluntary govt service as opposed to forcing patriotism by involuntary servitude?




Absolutely. The whole premise of charity is doing something you dont have to, but that you want to do for the greater good. It loses its noble intentions when its forced. I can name plenty of specific issues I have a problem with, but it all comes down to one fundamental problem. The belief that we as people are not capable of thinking for ourselves, so its the governments job to think for us. To tell us whats right and wrong, to guide us in every aspect of our lives. But the problem isnt just with the government. The real problem here is the widespread lack of responsibility of the people. Noone wants to take responsibility for their own actions, its just easier to blame it on something bigger than them. Lets censor the world, take away everything thats "wrong" so that the parents dont have to teach their kids the difference, or to punish them when they make the wrong choices. And then when they still make the wrong choices, lets blame it on something else. The TV is too violent, thats why kid beat yours up at recess. I could go on and on, but who's going to listen. Who wants to take the responsibility that comes with freedom?
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 11:02 AM
  #12  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Heres another interesting thought. How many times have you seen or heard of the kid who is constantly trying to fix whats wrong with everyone around them, and ends up being alienated, and ultimately learns that they are in fact the one with problems? And the happy ending comes when they learn that they cant meddle in everyone elses problems when they have their own to deal with? I cant count the number of books, movies, etc that has been the focus of. Its not ok to do as a kid, so what makes it right to do it as an adult, and on a grander scale, to do as a country?
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 11:07 AM
  #13  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
phinsup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Default

Liberty- freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc.; power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice.



(as per the dictionary)



The Unanimous Declaration

of the Thirteen United States of America aka the declaration of independance








When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.



He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.



He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.



He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.



He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.



He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.



He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.



He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.



He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.



He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.



He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.



He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.



He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.



He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:



For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:



For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:



For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:



For imposing taxes on us without our consent:



For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:



For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:





For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:



For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:



For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.



He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.



He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.



He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.



He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.



He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.



In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.



Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.



We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
phinsup is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 03:53 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

Originally Posted by phinsup' post='918896' date='Mar 23 2009, 10:57 AM
What has changed in America from the days prior to WWI when young americans willfully and proudly joined the armed forces and prior to the draft (est 1940)?
I recall stories of young men who committed suicide because, for whatever reason, they could not join the military. Nowadays, it would not surprise me to see stories of guys committing suicide because they were forced to serve.
Baldy is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 05:08 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

People who were forced to serve in Vietnam fled to Canada!
defprun is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 08:05 PM
  #16  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Including a former president...
mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 03-24-2009, 06:19 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

defprun is offline  
Old 03-25-2009, 11:55 PM
  #18  
Super Moderator
 
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,763
Default

Not him... this guy



mazdaspeed7 is offline  
Old 03-26-2009, 10:32 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

Oh okay, hard to recognize him without his sax.
defprun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nofxpunk_541
Northwest
7
02-14-2006 12:27 AM
ArmyOfOne
Other parts of the world
17
11-29-2005 03:49 AM
R.P.M.
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
3
04-05-2005 10:12 PM
9BASE3
Insert BS here
13
03-11-2003 12:30 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Anyone Read the "GIVE ACT", headed to the senate.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.