Any window guys here?Not you phinsup...
07-21-2002, 01:25 AM
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2
Win XP home (32 bit) Win XP Pro (64 bit) is windows NT, Win2000 is based
on Windows NT also..all of them , you can use the NTFS format ---ie,,--NT
I use XP home and it works great,,but then again i'm a pentium 4, 1.7 gig
with 256mb of DDR ram.a bus speed of 266 mhz,40 gig WD 7200rpm HD
etc,etc..i like XP,,over ME and win2000
on Windows NT also..all of them , you can use the NTFS format ---ie,,--NT
I use XP home and it works great,,but then again i'm a pentium 4, 1.7 gig
with 256mb of DDR ram.a bus speed of 266 mhz,40 gig WD 7200rpm HD
etc,etc..i like XP,,over ME and win2000
07-21-2002, 07:40 AM
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,068
Originally Posted by Skreeching Vomit' date='Jul 21 2002, 02:25 AM
Win XP home (32 bit) Win XP Pro (64 bit) is windows NT, Win2000 is based
on Windows NT also..all of them , you can use the NTFS format ---ie,,--NT
I use XP home and it works great,,but then again i'm a pentium 4, 1.7 gig
with 256mb of DDR ram.a bus speed of 266 mhz,40 gig WD 7200rpm HD
etc,etc..i like XP,,over ME and win2000
on Windows NT also..all of them , you can use the NTFS format ---ie,,--NT
I use XP home and it works great,,but then again i'm a pentium 4, 1.7 gig
with 256mb of DDR ram.a bus speed of 266 mhz,40 gig WD 7200rpm HD
etc,etc..i like XP,,over ME and win2000
Im gonan use it for a online game server (UO) untill I get a large player base..then pay for a dedicated server...
07-21-2002, 07:42 AM
#6
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,068
Originally Posted by Rotarydragon' date='Jul 20 2002, 08:37 PM
If you need a server Win2K is it for the time being, Windows.NET is still in Beta 2 last I checked.
But will I really need win2k?
07-21-2002, 09:25 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Close enough to annoy you.
Posts: 1,381
XP Pro is NOT 64 bit unless you're running an Itanium processor.
To run a dedicated UO server? Dunno hard question, Pro would probably do OK. Pro is throttled as far as network bandwidth goes but that shouldn't be an issue till later
The last UO server I was toying with was a mem hog.
To run a dedicated UO server? Dunno hard question, Pro would probably do OK. Pro is throttled as far as network bandwidth goes but that shouldn't be an issue till later
The last UO server I was toying with was a mem hog.
07-21-2002, 11:25 AM
#9
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,068
A friend told me Win XP takes alot of ram..and yes Im gonan run a UO shard just till i get about 30 people online @ all times..or till I cant hold no more..then I will get a dedicated server..
The emulator is made by Sphere...
The emulator is made by Sphere...
07-21-2002, 12:10 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Close enough to annoy you.
Posts: 1,381
Originally Posted by SoRRoW RPMWARZ' date='Jul 21 2002, 07:25 PM
A friend told me Win XP takes alot of ram..and yes Im gonan run a UO shard just till i get about 30 people online @ all times..or till I cant hold no more..then I will get a dedicated server..
The emulator is made by Sphere...
The emulator is made by Sphere...
Not familiar with that one but I've not toyed with any of them for a long long long time.
Still play UO once in a blue moon tho.