Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2004, 05:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RX7Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NASA/JSC - Clear Lake, TX
Posts: 870
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 17 2004, 01:47 PM
you guys finish the cost report yet?
i've done my part, costing the A-arms, ARB blades, and rockers.



i still need to cost the pullrods, rear toe links, and ARB links



we focused all our time on building, next week is for cost reporting. hehe.



oh, and i just got our shocks in. fox vanilla RC, new, but they seem to be way to stiff. $230 a piece from fox, plus dealer markup (which we didn't have to pay), but we still have to cost them at like $400 a piece.



what are yall running for shocks?
RX7Aggie is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:19 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

We run vanillia RC on all four corners. adjustable wheel rates.



I think the Queen's FSAE car is cooler
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-p3170367.jpg  
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

dasdf
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-p3170364.jpg  
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:20 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

asdf
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-p3170361.jpg  
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:20 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

fdafd
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-p3170351.jpg  
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:24 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

asdf
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-the_car.jpg  
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 06:41 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by RX7Aggie' date='Mar 17 2004, 06:12 PM
i've done my part, costing the A-arms, ARB blades, and rockers.



i still need to cost the pullrods, rear toe links, and ARB links



we focused all our time on building, next week is for cost reporting. hehe.



oh, and i just got our shocks in. fox vanilla RC, new, but they seem to be way to stiff. $230 a piece from fox, plus dealer markup (which we didn't have to pay), but we still have to cost them at like $400 a piece.



what are yall running for shocks?
Why do u say they are way to stiff? u mean u have too much rebound/compression dampening? or u mean the springs are too stiff?



In reality it doesn't matter because u can change the attachment points on your Rocker Plates, it is just the lever arm rule.
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 08:20 PM
  #18  
Super Moderator

 
banzaitoyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My BIG ol TURBO-DIESEL
Posts: 5,181
Default

very nice. Details of the oven please?
banzaitoyota is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 11:00 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RX7Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NASA/JSC - Clear Lake, TX
Posts: 870
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 17 2004, 06:41 PM
Why do u say they are way to stiff? u mean u have too much rebound/compression dampening? or u mean the springs are too stiff?



In reality it doesn't matter because u can change the attachment points on your Rocker Plates, it is just the lever arm rule.
i mean the shocks seem too stiff in compression, stiffer than what they dyno plots show. on the lowest setting, we hardly can compress them by hand, and in the past with the rock shox and rissis we could. i'm going to talk to fox about it. supposedly they removed the pro-pedal damping, and maybe they charged the nitrogen too much and it stiffened it up.



our installation ratio is set at 0.70, using the entire movement of the shock. we dont want to lower it because that will decrease the range of adjustment.



i like the CF A-arms



that box is busy, crazy looking. for the rear that is. i hate CNC because IT TAKES SOOO LONG. in house, you ahve to have a programmer for the machine. outhouse, it costs lots of money and/or it gets backed up.



this year, we went welded sheet for most things. whenver we did that in the past (2000, 2001), we did the best, winning 1st in '00 and 5th on '01. both with pullrods. so, we did pullrods again.



what is your body? fiberglass? we did CF last year, but you have to cost it at $100 / lb, and ours weighed like 12 lbs including side pods; $1200 wasted.



this ABS plastic is $15 / sheet, and it takes 3 sheets to do our complete body!!!! plus cost of 15 sec to pull the body out of the oven, turn on the vaccuum, and cool it with rags. our body will be less than $100 this year, hehe.



our diff assembly is cool, it emphasizes direct load paths between it and the engine. weighs like 3 lb less than last year, and we are using Ti halfshafts, hehe.
Attached Thumbnails 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update-dsc01449.jpg  
RX7Aggie is offline  
Old 03-17-2004, 11:02 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RX7Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NASA/JSC - Clear Lake, TX
Posts: 870
Default

what did you model your car in, solidworks?
RX7Aggie is offline  


Quick Reply: 2004 Texas A&m Fsae Update



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.