13B N/A Map
08-24-2002, 11:18 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 790
If I can figure out how to upload....
Here is the base map for a 13B N/A
My 13B is a 88' 6 port (sleves removed)
550cc injectors
K & N Air cleaner right off the throttle body
2nd butterflys removed
EGR... Airpump... Power Steering.. all gone
Stock intake
Header w 2-1/2" exhaust all the way back.
NOS 2 fogger nozzles into each rotor
I'll post the map I'm running after I dyno it. I am running alot of ignition curve on my current map.
Here is the base map for a 13B N/A
My 13B is a 88' 6 port (sleves removed)
550cc injectors
K & N Air cleaner right off the throttle body
2nd butterflys removed
EGR... Airpump... Power Steering.. all gone
Stock intake
Header w 2-1/2" exhaust all the way back.
NOS 2 fogger nozzles into each rotor
I'll post the map I'm running after I dyno it. I am running alot of ignition curve on my current map.
08-29-2002, 05:22 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 790
Yes, 88 13B with the stock trans to the stock Suzuki 5.13:1 rear end. (1st and 2nd gear shifts are quick at full throttle)
I'm still don't have my NOS bottle filled but I'm going to see about some runs Friday night at PIR. It's 2350 lbs without the top, +/- 50 because the scale I used rounds in 50 lbs increments. I'm going to remove the spare tire on the back too.
The build up of it can be found here.
I'm still don't have my NOS bottle filled but I'm going to see about some runs Friday night at PIR. It's 2350 lbs without the top, +/- 50 because the scale I used rounds in 50 lbs increments. I'm going to remove the spare tire on the back too.
The build up of it can be found here.
08-31-2002, 01:31 PM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 790
Here is the latest Map I am running, No change in Fuel but the ignition curve is much better.
Trailing vs. Leading I believe is now correct as is the vacuum advance.
It runs like a TOP
Until I get a Wide Band O2 Sensor this is probably as good as it gets.
[Again this is for a 13B N/A 6 Port Motor, 550cc injectors (If using the stock injectors add a trim **** and turn it up 25% which should be right) Header, 2-1/2 exhaust and no sleves. E6K 6.34 firmware]
Trailing vs. Leading I believe is now correct as is the vacuum advance.
It runs like a TOP
Until I get a Wide Band O2 Sensor this is probably as good as it gets.
[Again this is for a 13B N/A 6 Port Motor, 550cc injectors (If using the stock injectors add a trim **** and turn it up 25% which should be right) Header, 2-1/2 exhaust and no sleves. E6K 6.34 firmware]
12-23-2002, 01:27 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,930
Originally Posted by dac' date='Aug 31 2002, 06:31 PM
Here is the latest Map I am running, No change in Fuel but the ignition curve is much better.
Trailing vs. Leading I believe is now correct as is the vacuum advance.
It runs like a TOP
Until I get a Wide Band O2 Sensor this is probably as good as it gets.
[Again this is for a 13B N/A 6 Port Motor, 550cc injectors (If using the stock injectors add a trim **** and turn it up 25% which should be right) Header, 2-1/2 exhaust and no sleves. E6K 6.34 firmware]
Trailing vs. Leading I believe is now correct as is the vacuum advance.
It runs like a TOP
Until I get a Wide Band O2 Sensor this is probably as good as it gets.
[Again this is for a 13B N/A 6 Port Motor, 550cc injectors (If using the stock injectors add a trim **** and turn it up 25% which should be right) Header, 2-1/2 exhaust and no sleves. E6K 6.34 firmware]
12-28-2002, 03:51 PM
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 790
The 6 port sleves have been removed. I plan to go Turbo by Summer of 2003, I was hoping to have the body completed with new paint, but I want more power first. Still with the 5.13:1 rear end I will be putting a locker in it to keep the power planted to the ground. This vehicle seems perfect for a nice BridgePort or PP. But the Turbo will be cheaper, quieter and quicker.
No Dyno yet, it's been just sitting (too cold out to work on it). Decided to go with a Turbo before I dyno it.
No Dyno yet, it's been just sitting (too cold out to work on it). Decided to go with a Turbo before I dyno it.
01-05-2003, 08:45 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Originally Posted by dac' date='Dec 28 2002, 01:51 PM
The 6 port sleves have been removed. I plan to go Turbo by Summer of 2003, I was hoping to have the body completed with new paint, but I want more power first. Still with the 5.13:1 rear end I will be putting a locker in it to keep the power planted to the ground. This vehicle seems perfect for a nice BridgePort or PP. But the Turbo will be cheaper, quieter and quicker.
No Dyno yet, it's been just sitting (too cold out to work on it). Decided to go with a Turbo before I dyno it.
No Dyno yet, it's been just sitting (too cold out to work on it). Decided to go with a Turbo before I dyno it.