ECU Discussions Area for Haltech, Power FC, MOTEC and other ECUs

Basic Engine Tuning

Old Feb 25, 2004 | 02:53 AM
  #81  
booyaaa's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
Default

heres a link with the answers to all these questions. It should give you a good understanding of the concept of tunning, It did for me.



http://sdsefi.com/tech.html
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #82  
Srce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

I gotta go to work, but when I come back I'm gonna start going through all of that.
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 02:37 AM
  #83  
4CN AIR's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Aug 29 2003, 06:02 PM
they are prolly right, i read a really good article a couple weeks ago, i wish i could find it. bascially detonation is a chemical reaction, that needs lots of heat



mike
Detonation is simply combustion not caused by the spark plug, is it not? It is caused by hot spots. Higher octane burns slower and takes more heat to ignite thus reducing detonation.





I'm sure there is more to it than that, but I believe the above is all true.





Maximum Boost by Corky Bell is an incredible read.
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #84  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by 4CN AIR' date='Apr 7 2004, 11:37 PM
Detonation is simply combustion not caused by the spark plug, is it not? It is caused by hot spots. Higher octane burns slower and takes more heat to ignite thus reducing detonation.





I'm sure there is more to it than that, but I believe the above is all true.





Maximum Boost by Corky Bell is an incredible read.
pre ignition and detonation are different.



pre ignition is when the mixture lights off of something other than the spark plug, ie a hot spot. its basically normal combustion at the wrong time



detonation is when the air fuel mix explodes. a normal burn is relatively slow, explosion has a shock wave that breaks things
Old Apr 13, 2004 | 10:46 PM
  #85  
RETed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 925
From: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Default

This is one of those subjects where a little knowledge can be dangerous...



I cringe when I see people trying to hit a target "number" and expect it to work or be safe.



All these numbers are used as guidelines, and I do not recommend them to be set-in-stone rules.



Due to variances in EGT sensor / gauge and wide-band / UEGO manufacturing and engine / exhaust configuration variances, you are going to get slightly different results from different set-ups.



Exhaust design can induce weird resonances and turbulences that can throw off readings that would normally look safe but in reality it isn't.



Increased experience will help you know what's safe and what isn't.

To give you a recent experience, we're trying to tune a 20B NA using an Defi (Farenheit) EGT gauge. Probe is about 20" from rear rotor and over 25" from front rotor. The EGT's don't go over 1200F, but I know it's losing power due to it being lean. 1200F is waaay too cold, and we're trying to figure out why this is the case. The engine seems to make best power at around 1000F to 1050F. Now, if I recommended this to everyone, you guys would typically be running very rich.



Wide-bands can only aide you in adjusting fuel. You cannot use the wide-band to adjust ignition timing. This is why I prefer EGT gauges over wide-bands for total tuning.





-Ted
Old Apr 14, 2004 | 10:45 AM
  #86  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RETed' date='Apr 13 2004, 07:46 PM
This is one of those subjects where a little knowledge can be dangerous...



I cringe when I see people trying to hit a target "number" and expect it to work or be safe.



All these numbers are used as guidelines, and I do not recommend them to be set-in-stone rules.



Due to variances in EGT sensor / gauge and wide-band / UEGO manufacturing and engine / exhaust configuration variances, you are going to get slightly different results from different set-ups.



Exhaust design can induce weird resonances and turbulences that can throw off readings that would normally look safe but in reality it isn't.



Increased experience will help you know what's safe and what isn't.

To give you a recent experience, we're trying to tune a 20B NA using an Defi (Farenheit) EGT gauge. Probe is about 20" from rear rotor and over 25" from front rotor. The EGT's don't go over 1200F, but I know it's losing power due to it being lean. 1200F is waaay too cold, and we're trying to figure out why this is the case. The engine seems to make best power at around 1000F to 1050F. Now, if I recommended this to everyone, you guys would typically be running very rich.



Wide-bands can only aide you in adjusting fuel. You cannot use the wide-band to adjust ignition timing. This is why I prefer EGT gauges over wide-bands for total tuning.





-Ted
thats a good example



on the its car we ended up at 22btdc@wot from 2000ish to the power peak at 6500, then we were able to go to 26btdc and it gave us a very broad power peak.



suprisingly fuel didnt do anything for power as long as it was leaner than 12.8. we went from 12.8 to leaner than 13.5 with less than a 1 hp difference in power. this is wierd but good, cause if we run it lean and put in the s5 tank we eliminate a pitstop during the enduros
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #87  
Jims5543's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,934
From: Jensen Beach, FL / Sylva, NC
Default

After dynoing today it has become painfully obvious that I need a lot more work on my maps. I cant complain I pulled 327RWHP with a T-04E at 1 bar of boost. My AFR was 11.5 across the board during boost.



But I know there is more there. I need to look at my timing maps and post up I would love to know if there is some room for improvement.
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #88  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Jims5543' date='Apr 27 2004, 05:15 PM
After dynoing today it has become painfully obvious that I need a lot more work on my maps. I cant complain I pulled 327RWHP with a T-04E at 1 bar of boost. My AFR was 11.5 across the board during boost.



But I know there is more there. I need to look at my timing maps and post up I would love to know if there is some room for improvement.
Please do post them up Jim.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #89  
RETed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 925
From: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Default

I read a post recently from a guy who is going through that EFI University thing mentioned in SS or SCC mag, and they did a quickly comparo on two well-known wide-band systems, MoTeC and Autronic. These are not some of the "cheaper" wide-band kits available now but cost significantly more.



The engine was a Porsche 3.6 or 3.2 liter flat 6. Wide-band probes were positioned at identical lengths away from the exhaust ports in the exhaust paths opposite of each other in the pipe. The difference in AFR readings were 0.3! I think the absolute numbers were 12.0 versus 12.3 - something to think about.





-Ted
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #90  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

so like the sensors were facing each other in the pipe?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.