3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

making the stock twins non seq????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 11:44 PM
  #1  
grngtcfd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 272
Default

hey guys, my car should be out of the shop soon (finally). don't have money for a single turbo yet (just spent $5k). i'm thinking of making my stock twins non seq, what you guys think??? with the mods i have, does that make sense??? what kind of power difference would i feel??? i don't mind extra lag (it's my weekend car). i'm still very new to the whole rotory thing. i've had my car now for a year (half the time, the car was in the shop) so i don't know if i were to do it, would i do it myself. i would like to, but i'm not a great on working on cars. i could do basic things like brakes, intake, exhaust, tune - ups. stuff like that. if i do it, should i do it myself???? or maybe i can pay someone in the forum that lives in the bay area to do it for me, then i can sit and learn from someone.......hmmmmm

thank you for all your help. :P
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 12:39 AM
  #2  
Ben93rx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 123
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Here is a site that tells you when/why you should do it, and HOW TO do it along with a bunch of other peoples opinions on it.



I m having probs with my 2nd turbo not kickin in so I was thinkin bout trying this, but MIGHT just go with a single turbo.



Happy reading.



Ben
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 12:40 AM
  #3  
Ben93rx7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 123
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Whoops, here is the link:



Non-Sequential Info
Old Aug 28, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
grngtcfd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 272
Default

yeah, i've seen it, but see, i don't have a garage, so the work seems hard. n e ideas???
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 11:46 AM
  #5  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

just a note if your seq twins are working fine. don't bother making it nonseq you won't get anymore power
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
grngtcfd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 272
Default

ooo, so does it just simplfy the system???
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 11:53 PM
  #7  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Post

Well that and you eliminate transition boost spikes. It cleans up the engine bay alot also.

I dont want to sound like a broken record but. The poor mans non sequntial how to is on Our site.



dontbearikki.com
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 05:40 AM
  #8  
Fe3Boost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 657
From: Alexandria Va
Default

It sure is FD3Boost. Vosko you cant run from me haha. Anyhow NON-SEQ is the best way to go. SEQ is a mess and spikes to much and takes out motors and secondary turbos. NON-SEQ makes more sense and is just easy and real smooth.



-Rikki
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #9  
jspecracer7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
From: Okinawa, Japan
Default

Originally Posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki' date='Sep 3 2002, 08:40 PM
It sure is FD3Boost. Vosko you cant run from me haha. Anyhow NON-SEQ is the best way to go. SEQ is a mess and spikes to much and takes out motors and secondary turbos. NON-SEQ makes more sense and is just easy and real smooth.



-Rikki
Yep. Power comes on how you expect it. It doesn't have the 1-2 punch like the stock sequential, but it makes up for it in simplicity. Also, the power is SMOOTH all the way thru.
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 12:16 AM
  #10  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Default

Which setup do you prefer on stock twins?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.