CYM #1150
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,928
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Dont_Be_A_Rikki' date='Jun 17 2003, 12:30 PM
Well the last six on the vin is 201150. ...
just fact findin... and makin sure the correct info is published..
and that the claims are substantiated..
as noted.. 1150 is a stretch from 150
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Originally Posted by 9BASE3' date='Jun 17 2003, 04:35 PM
Which numbers are significant? I'd like to see what # mine is... Just for fun. Not like it's a CYM or anything.
mike
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 11
Hehe. First of all, $30k for an Rx7 to me would be ridiculous (I love how you throw in "at least" lol. I don't care if it is a CYM. I know of a 94 Black R2 for $20K with 28k mi and I think that's overpriced, and yet more diserable than that CYM.
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.
And I digress...
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Originally Posted by Leprechaun' date='Jun 17 2003, 05:25 PM
Hehe. First of all, $30k for an Rx7 to me would be ridiculous (I love how you throw in "at least" lol. I don't care if it is a CYM. I know of a 94 Black R2 for $20K with 28k mi and I think that's overpriced, and yet more diserable than that CYM.
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.
And I digress...
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Originally Posted by 9BASE3' date='Jun 17 2003, 04:35 PM
Which numbers are significant? I'd like to see what # mine is... Just for fun. Not like it's a CYM or anything.
JM1 FD 33 1 * P 0 ####
JM1=Mazda Passenger car
FD=RX7 3rd gen Series
33=Coupe
1=1308cc USA Spec
2=1308cc Canadian spec
3=Maunal seatbelts and Dual Airbags
*=check digit
P=1993
R=1994
S=1995
0=Hirshoshima Plant
####=Serial Number
Mine is #8364.
I totaled #9261 about 4 years ago
Thats all folks
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,142
From: Houston Texas
Originally Posted by Leprechaun' date='Jun 17 2003, 05:25 PM
Hehe. First of all, $30k for an Rx7 to me would be ridiculous (I love how you throw in "at least" lol. I don't care if it is a CYM. I know of a 94 Black R2 for $20K with 28k mi and I think that's overpriced, and yet more diserable than that CYM.
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.
And I digress...
And there's no way a car with 30k and 10 years old smells new. I'm sorry.
Also, why would anyone want the earliest production models OF AN FD of all cars? Earlier the production the more errors, and more recalls (or recalls that weren't done most likely)....esp with our cars.