3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

Bnr Turbo Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:30 AM
  #11  
Goodfellafd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 252
From: Morristown NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Actionhank' date='Jun 3 2003, 10:01 PM
It seems to me that with the BNR stage 3s you could get a healthy 370+ Hp at like 16psi and be in a preaty reliable setup as long as you had all of the other mods to go with it. I dont know a whole lot about them, I havent done a endless amout of HW on them yet, but that seems doable.



My only question about them is this : Lets say I wanted to run them at like 10psi, how would then run? Like complete *** or would they just be really boggy? the reason I ask this is because I figure if I had them in my car, I dont think I would want to run 15+psi all day every day. Could I drop the psi down to 10 and still be happy when Im pokin around town?
They're fine at 10 psi--enough to dust a Z06, as Eddie posted in the Kills section (One hell of a night for the seven). Check this out: when fellow FD owners ride with me, they think I'm running sequential. They don't believe I'm running parallel until I pop the hood and point to that big space under my intake manifold . *That's* how quick these bad boys spool!



I don't think some of you guys realize the performance of these things. Granted, I've got a Gotham/Kan ported motor, but any FD set up like mine should have similar performance numbers.



Do me a favor, guys. Find your favorite stretch of deserted highway with a pal riding shotgun with a stopwatch, and slow to 40 mph in 2nd gear. Punch it, and don't let off until the very top of 4th, 8000 rpm at ~140 mph. I did it consistently in 14 seconds flat, and was running 1.14 (~16.2 psi) on the power fc commander. For a frame of reference, the big bad new 500 ci 500 hp 525 torque Viper SRT-10 did it in......15.1 seconds. 'Nuff said
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
SENNALIVES's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 46
Default

Reality check, check around first, I hear of lots of failuers with the BNR's . I have and will soon remove my Stage II's . I did put down 320rw on a seq. ( 13psi) set up, but they are eating up oil like crazy. I wont say who I purchased these from but they told me they are getting most of the BNR's back for repair . If you have some money to spare and alot of patience go for it.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:03 AM
  #13  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

i'd go for 99 twins..... they are NEW
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 03:41 PM
  #14  
Srce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

Jspec - I totaly agree with all of the stuff you said bro, but I myself prefer the Twins. (Kill me for it, but still)



I'd go with some GT28's or 30's instead of the stock twins but I have seen the stockers make 400. I highly doubt they'll last long at that range but the fact is that it's doable.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #15  
9BASE3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

My setup will (or should) be capable of 400+. I won't test to see how long they last at that number though... I'm hoping a nice, streetable, RELIABLE 360ish for daily stomping. I think Goodfella has the setup to beat!



Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the big singles, but I can't afford that ****... LOL
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 05:00 PM
  #16  
r_xplicit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,305
From: jackson, ms
Default

if you are a non believer, call brian @ BNR and speak to him yourself.....
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #17  
r_xplicit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,305
From: jackson, ms
Default

adn ask SPOautos about the craftsmanship.....
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 05:44 PM
  #18  
SENNALIVES's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 46
Default

Sure hes a great guy , but is he going to pay the 500 bucks to remove them and put them back in ? and my down time ? I could be bitter I have less then 2k on my stage II's and there getting taken out in two months .As for money , I think in the long run going single is cheaper than chasing these twins around
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 06:28 PM
  #19  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

single is much more reliable the main hard part about going single is getting it tuned!!!



my car has been great since the single conversion.... i do have 100% rock solid boost control down to 9psi
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #20  
jspecracer7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
From: Okinawa, Japan
Default

I LOVE BEING SINGLE!!!... no other feeling of the wastegate cracking and your *** end sliding around on 275 Nitto 555R's...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.