1994 Fd Vs. 2000 Audi A4 1.8t quattro what to buy?
11-07-2005, 04:24 PM
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 23
In comparisant I saw a 3rotor FD run 11.6 145 mph once again the MPH is impressive not the time. The rest comes down to driver, traction, and outside conditions. My fastest in my GSX was 11.2 at 128 which is impressive to me so to see higher trapspeeds esp. 160mph I can only imagine, guess you have to see it and hear it to know waht im talking aobut so no use in trying to explain to you what 11.2 looks like when he traps at 160 mph. Or the FD at 145 easiest way would be to say as soon as eighther one caught traction is was a totally different race, like a jet just hit its afterburners or something. Guess you would have to see it
11-07-2005, 09:25 PM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 116
Rosati, if you can't decide . that means you are not really ready for the FD. For some of us (i actually mean most), there is no other car that will satisfiy us.
Be it a FD or other rotary engine cars (most Rx cars are sexy
) It is something that draws us to it. The unique sound, the crappy mpg(sometimes) and the high reving limit of the rotary engine.
I think that A4 would be the better choice for you. sorry to say
but i am sure you will be happy with that car.
Be it a FD or other rotary engine cars (most Rx cars are sexy
) It is something that draws us to it. The unique sound, the crappy mpg(sometimes) and the high reving limit of the rotary engine. I think that A4 would be the better choice for you. sorry to say
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)