3rd Gen F.A.Q.'s Post Common Issues, Installtions, Repairs and more pertaining to 3rd Gen RX-7's.

Non Sequential Mod How To Do It ?

Old Feb 2, 2003 | 12:26 AM
  #21  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

non seq gets rid of all that seq mumbo jumbo
oh ok..
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #22  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Default

You wont gain any horse power, although alot of guys that made the conversion swear that it is faster.

You lose the jerky unpredictablility of the sequential set up.

Whenyou spool it up , the boost rise is steady and when It gets to it's set level. It consistantly holds

till redline.

No spking and jumping all over the place.

Just a smooth ride at say 12 psi or whatever feels sweet..

Also you lose most of the hoses so if you have a leak you have 7 hoses to look over as

opposed to 40 or so..
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 12:41 AM
  #23  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

You wont gain any horse power, although alot of guys that made the conversion swear that it is faster.

You lose the jerky unpredictablility of the sequential set up.

Whenyou spool it up , the boost rise is steady and when It gets to it's set level. It consistantly holds

till redline.

No spking and jumping all over the place.

Just a smooth ride at say 12 psi or whatever feels sweet..

Also you lose most of the hoses so if you have a leak you have 7 hoses to look over as

opposed to 40 or so..
Oh ok.. humm.. sounds good.
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:08 AM
  #24  
Srce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

I just saw the diagram and thought "WTF?". Mazda has toooo much ******' time on their hands developing **** that complicated.
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:26 AM
  #25  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,725
From: La Plata, Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Feb 1 2003, 10:41 PM
You wont gain any horse power, although alot of guys that made the conversion swear that it is faster.

You lose the jerky unpredictablility of the sequential set up.

Whenyou spool it up , the boost rise is steady and when It gets to it's set level. It consistantly holds

till redline.

No spking and jumping all over the place.

Just a smooth ride at say 12 psi or whatever feels sweet..

Also you lose most of the hoses so if you have a leak you have 7 hoses to look over as

opposed to 40 or so..
Oh ok.. humm.. sounds good.
That must of took alot out of you to come up with that response :redface: :bigok:



You must be looking at my post and saying to yourself..
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:31 AM
  #26  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

That must of took alot out of you to come up with that response



You must be looking at my post and saying to yourself..
lol.. yea, I was thinking about wether it would worth doing it to mine.
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #27  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Because on this site:he says it may increase turbo lag..
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #28  
Dumbrotorkid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,713
Default

it will big time on a stock fd.....it takes a little longer to spool 2 turbos compared to one..yaknow?
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #29  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

it will big time on a stock fd.....it takes a little longer to spool 2 turbos compared to one..yaknow?
Well.. I don't want any lag.. and I'm not planning on going single turbo.. so, I guess I shouldn't go non-seq.
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 04:17 PM
  #30  
Dumbrotorkid's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,713
Default

is urs stock?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.