2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Wastegate Position / manifold design

Old 06-06-2006, 10:23 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
KillerRx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13
Default

Call me lazy if you like.



Would like to hear your opinions on this topic. >



http://ausrotary.dntinternet.com/forums/vi...ic.php?t=101806
KillerRx4 is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 11:12 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Not a good idea...
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 06-06-2006, 11:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Nospig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 277
Default

Yea not a good idea , a good responsive turbo will boost creep. If the wastegate pipes have a good collector exhaust interference will not be a problem .
Nospig is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 11:41 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Im in the process of making a new turbo manifold & im up to mounting the gate. I am thinking about putting the gate off 1 runner only to maintain a true divided setup.



Has anyone done this & had any trouble with the setup?



Its finished & fitted up now, I'll find out next week on the dyno if it does or doesnt work.
Im curious, what were the results? Im not totally convinced it will make high boost on 1 rotor with the WG open.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 06-07-2006, 05:55 PM
  #5  
Member
 
wankelTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 83
Default

Thats stupid as hell!



If you have a divided turbine housing then the air has to go into the turbo and come backwards down the other runner to bypass the turbine. Even if there is no boost creep which i think there would be, its still stupid.



I dont know that it would make high boost on one rotar, but if it did it would probably be on the rear rotar and thats bad.

I dont know though, i dont really think it would, the exhaust pressure btwn the rear rotar and turbo would be higher but that just means alittle less new air would enter the rear combustion chamber (a very very small amount less). It would just cause boost creep is all that i can see, and that may not be bad either, but that set up just doesnt make any sense. Intake manifold pressure is equal on both sides, so boost pressure is the same on both rotars. Its still stupid though, if he wants to do it that way he needs to have 2 small wastegates.
wankelTII is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 03:06 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
KillerRx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13
Default

Nospig, I expect it to either work & hold boost @ the desired 20psi or will Creep. Will be 1 or the other I imagine. Another possibility I think might happen is boost might come on softer/slower.



Ronin, I havent put it on the dyno yet. Booked for this time next week. Will be sure to post results.



WankelTII, I dont think you understand how a turbo & wastegate work together.

Originally Posted by wankelTII' post='823018
I dont know that it would make high boost on one rotar, but if it did it would probably be on the rear rotar and thats bad.


More boost to rear rotor simply because that rotors exhaust runner doesnt bypass the turbine? Dude, Theres no intake restriction to the rear rotor so it will recieve the same intake pressure as the front.



Originally Posted by wankelTII' post='823018
It would just cause boost creep is all that i can see, and that may not be bad either, but that set up just doesnt make any sense. Intake manifold pressure is equal on both sides, so boost pressure is the same on both rotars. Its still stupid though, if he wants to do it that way he needs to have 2 small wastegates.


Ahha, boost creep.
KillerRx4 is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 08:02 AM
  #7  
Member
 
wankelTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 83
Default

Its a completely divided set up, (i assume that means the turbine housing is divided too) air from the rear rotar cannot get to the wastegate without actually going into the turbine housing and coming back down the front rotar's exhaust runner. I dont think the air can or will do that, so the creep wont just be a small amount.



Do you understand how wastegates work?!?! If the air cant get around the turbine then it will continue to spin the turbine wheel.



Someone else said there would be high boost on one rotar, i realized in a matter of 3 sentences that wasnt possible, i just didnt go back and take out my thought process. But your right intake pressure is intake pressure, ok duh.



Even if it works, I still think its a ridiculous way to do it. Its got to cause some wierd stress on the bearings or something to have way more exhaust pressure on one rotar. Why not just do it the normal way, or with 2 smaller wastegates? Neither are difficult, this just looks like you got lazy or something.
wankelTII is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 11:30 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
jefraney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 244
Default

A properly sized wastegate anywhere before the turbine will technically work.



Obviously, dont use a little 28mm wastegate on this setup. I would use the largest you can find. You have to remember that a wastegates function is to equalize the pressure before and after the turbine. The more pressure you can release, the more control you have (larger is always better in theis case).



Its not a good design, but it should do what you need it to, but you may have some creeping issues depending on the rest of your system.
jefraney is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 05:20 PM
  #9  
Member
 
wankelTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 83
Default

Yes, but how does the pressure get equalized if the only way for it to escape the rear exhaust runner is to go through the turbo? There is undoubtedly going to be high pressure between the rear rotar and the turbine housing, I guess since the turbine is rather large and the front exhaust runner could possibly get close to atmospheric pressure when the wastegate is fully open, the creep might stop somewhere fairly reasonable, but i am willing to bet that the boost will be more than the wastegate spring was rated for.
wankelTII is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 05:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

I think everyone is shooting down the idea before it even gets tested.



I have some theories about that setup and what it will do. Some positive, some negative that I think I will hold on to until it gets dyno'ed.
RONIN FC is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Wastegate Position / manifold design



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.