2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion
View Poll Results: Which is better?
supercharger
24.18%
turbo
73.63%
none
2.20%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Supercharged or Turbocharged

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2006, 01:41 PM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
Peepsalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tejas
Posts: 6
Default

In general I consider superchargers to be better for low end torque, while turbochargers are better suited for high rpm horsepower.



I chose turbocharger since we are talking rotaries though. Rotaries in particular seem to go well with turbochargers since it capitalizes on the high exhaust energy that rotaries have.
Peepsalot is offline  
Old 10-26-2006, 12:53 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
rmriggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 519
Default

The only supercharger I would consider putting on any rotary would be a centrifugal type. They would be easy to fabricate a bracket for and are as easy to intercool as a turbo is. They do have a little bit of lag like turbos do because they essentially are a turbo that is spun by a belt rather than exhaust gas.

I think that Maria Motorsports used to sell a centrifugal type supercharger setup (wonder why they stopped?).
rmriggin is offline  
Old 12-06-2006, 04:38 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

I've always been told that on a 6/7/8000hp top fuel car, the s/c takes over 1000hp to drive. Talk about parasidic drag wowzers!
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:01 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
doobieboy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9
Default

question. How many companies acauly make these things for rotaries? i meen, with stock turbo cars you generally dont see very many for good reason. Stock S5 13b's generally dont have that much turbo lag, compared to other cars of the era like the toyota supra, so i dont see much of a point fabbing up some s/c setup when you could just get a decent setup on what was stock a turbo
doobieboy3 is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 11:45 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Leetheslacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Oh hi hoe!
Posts: 2,286
Default

theres also the fact of noise



NA's are ******* loud.

on TII's the turbo acts as a muffler pretty much, so it quiets things down.
Leetheslacker is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:41 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Yeah it seems it's nearly a waste not to turbo a rotary, way too much energy in the exhaust - some of the 20b's posted here have turbos that look like they're nearly as wide as the engines they're on.
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 01:22 AM
  #37  
Junior Member
 
slvrwng2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lasvegas nevada
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Leetheslacker' post='849070' date='Dec 13 2006, 09:45 PM

theres also the fact of noise



NA's are ******* loud.

on TII's the turbo acts as a muffler pretty much, so it quiets things down.


So your saying that when i turbo my na im going to lose one of the things that i like the most about my car.

That great loud high revved sound....hmm maybe ill look into super chargers then.
slvrwng2000 is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 08:27 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Leetheslacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Oh hi hoe!
Posts: 2,286
Default

Originally Posted by slvrwng2000' post='857422' date='Feb 5 2007, 02:22 AM

So your saying that when i turbo my na im going to lose one of the things that i like the most about my car.

That great loud high revved sound....hmm maybe ill look into super chargers then.


the turbo acts as a muffler.



with the exact same exhasut on a na and a turbo, the turbo will be a little quieter. but im not saying all turbo cars are quiet.
Leetheslacker is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 11:14 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by Leetheslacker' post='857457' date='Feb 5 2007, 07:27 AM

the turbo acts as a muffler.



with the exact same exhasut on a na and a turbo, the turbo will be a little quieter. but im not saying all turbo cars are quiet.


you're taking the energy that would go out the exhaust as noise and using it to spin the turbo
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 01:35 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
turborotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 1,622
Default

Who is still making supercharger kits like Nelson used to have for the FC?



Would like to doe something like that for the vert. and when time comes to smog. just take it out. That's the only + thing I like about sc and the instant torque so i can make a heavy car take off the line a little better.
turborotor is offline  


Quick Reply: Supercharged or Turbocharged



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.