2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

S5 Tii Rats Nest Removal: 2 Diagrams, Which 1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
REFLUX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7
Default

Alright I've done a LOT of searching for removing the rats nest on an S5 TII but nothing CLEAR came out of it.



I have found two diagrams that show the final result for removing the vacuum rack but they're both different. Specifically in what to do with the lines going to/from the Charcoal Canister.



Which one is correct????



#1





#2

Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #2  
ColinRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,502
From: Canada
Default

First one is a cleaner setup, the second one is a bit haggard







BTW have fun putting vacuum caps on a turbo motor, the boost will blow them off!



Take new vacuum line and route them into eachother, that way there is no deadheaded nipple.
Old Dec 16, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #3  
ColinRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,502
From: Canada
Default

BTW whatever you do make sure your FPR vacuum line is exposed to constant vacuum. That one in the pic should be okay, just make sure it's one of the nipples that goes into the dynamic chamber rather than getting hidden somewhere in the TB.





I can't remember offhand which vacuum lines near the TB on the chamber actually go into the chamber and which go into the TB where there may/maynot be consistant vacuum.
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 08:33 AM
  #4  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

that 1st diagram is alittle different than how I did my. But ever since I did the vac rac simplication I get major hot start issues... Should've just left it alone... bah!
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Dec 16 2004, 09:10 PM
BTW whatever you do make sure your FPR vacuum line is exposed to constant vacuum. That one in the pic should be okay, just make sure it's one of the nipples that goes into the dynamic chamber rather than getting hidden somewhere in the TB.

I can't remember offhand which vacuum lines near the TB on the chamber actually go into the chamber and which go into the TB where there may/maynot be consistant vacuum.



it needs to see pressure too
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #6  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

i dont like either of those. if you want to eliminate emissions stuff why not just take out the 2 emissions solenoids and cap off the hoses? i mean theres only 4 solenoids total, its not like a cosmo where they have 16!
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

Mike can you give a diagram for a better configuration? I would love to know a better way that retains the OMP and charcoal can.
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Dec 17 2004, 08:43 AM
Mike can you give a diagram for a better configuration? I would love to know a better way that retains the OMP and charcoal can.



stock? seriously, if you take out the acv, you can just cap the vacuum lines at the vacuum rack and call it done.
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #9  
REFLUX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Dec 17 2004, 09:53 AM
you can just cap the vacuum lines at the vacuum rack and call it done.



Dumb question but what do you mean by this?
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #10  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Dec 17 2004, 11:53 AM
stock? seriously, if you take out the acv, you can just cap the vacuum lines at the vacuum rack and call it done.



damn... too late for me.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 PM.