2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Primary Fuel Rail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #11  
CGeek2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 521
From: Hell (Colorado School of Mines)
Default

Figured it out, I think.

The pd on the s5 fuel rail was blown. When I tried to blow through the s4 rail there was a lot of resistance to the flow, however, on the s5 rail there was no resistance at all. I figured the lack of idle and the stalling could be caused by low fuel pressure. The loud hissing noise I heard was fuel flowing freely through the rails. Swapped the Pri. rail back to stock and she runs great.



Does anyone know anything about the reliability difference between the s4 and s5 rail? The s5 looks better to me but if the pd on the s5 fails just as often as on the s4 then there is no point in me getting an s5 rail for my car.



Thnx

Andy
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #12  
roadkill669's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 572
From: Culpeper, VA
Default

I dont think that there is a real difference between the 2. I dunno though. Through my experiences so far, the S4 works great for me. I am pounding 60 psi all the time for a while and no probs yet. My car also has 95K on it. But new fuel setup soon so I wont have it much longer.
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #13  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

the s4 you can remove and replace the pd

s5 the pd is built into the unit basically, so to replace the pd you buy a whole new rail and PD.



a suggested move is to use a Marren Pulsation Dampener (injector.com) and make it work on the s5 rail do-able with the proper taps, but not done very often.



Ill be swapping toc ustom rails and FPR basically to avoid dealing with replacing a crappy design with the same stock crappy design.



the PD is like a bomb waiting to go off.



kevin.
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 11:12 PM
  #14  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

I just deleted the pd on the black t2 tonight. Swapped the banjo fitting and bolt opposite from the opposite side of the pd from a different rail...
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #15  
CGeek2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 521
From: Hell (Colorado School of Mines)
Default

Are you having any problems with not having a PD? It seems to me like the PD helps keep the fuel pressure up and without it the fuel pressure will always be low. At least I think that was my problem.
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 12:00 AM
  #16  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by CGeek2k' date='Feb 24 2004, 12:48 AM
Are you having any problems with not having a PD? It seems to me like the PD helps keep the fuel pressure up and without it the fuel pressure will always be low. At least I think that was my problem.
I will let you know when its running. Bigturbo74 did it on his car...
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #17  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

i doubt the PD would lower your fuel pressure, in my random thoughts at least.



but hey, its all possible, hell my motor mount was ******* up my wastegate.



kevin.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smitty
2nd Generation Specific
4
Mar 4, 2009 09:00 PM
86se7en
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
4
Jan 30, 2004 05:14 PM
joshuaRX707
3rd Generation Specific
4
Sep 23, 2003 09:14 PM
BigTurbo74
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
0
Aug 27, 2003 11:00 PM
1Revvin7
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
4
May 8, 2003 09:51 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.