2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Passed emissions with the new exaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #1  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

well, happily the car passed on its own, with flying colors. So I got the best of everything, no more rusty pre-silencer, no more disgusting fumes, and the tone is deeper. The scan didnt come up they way I wanted it,so Ill tell you the results : HC LIMIT: 2.00, tested: 0.95, CO limit: 30.0, tested 15.4, NOx limit: 4.00, tested 0.25. And there was no decrease in performance!
Old May 15, 2002 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
Powerpack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 233
Default

Yeah, I'm happy to hear about it since that is the exhaust setup I have in mind for my car, except that I want it in 3" pipe. Thanks for sharing info.
Old May 16, 2002 | 01:24 AM
  #3  
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,097
From: Lynnwood, WA
Default

That is good that you passed.



I wouldn't go with 3" unless you are planning on making gobbs of power. You want the exhaust pulse to flow at high velocity, causing low pressure behind the pulse. This causes almost a vacuum that sucks the next exhaust pulse out of the rotor housing/cylinder.
Old May 16, 2002 | 05:04 AM
  #4  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

3" would be compleatly useless, it would probably hinder performance if anything. Guys are making twice the horsepower and dont have 3".
Old May 16, 2002 | 10:20 AM
  #5  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

my gtu with bonez cat passed with flying colors. probably helped that i had a giant vacuum leak :P
Old May 16, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #6  
Turbo II's Avatar
omghi2u
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,259
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

I have 3" piping and I gained a lot of power. So ur saying ifi went, like 2" I'd experience morepower?
Old May 16, 2002 | 05:26 PM
  #7  
13BAce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,316
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo II' date='May 16 2002, 05:18 PM
I have 3" piping and I gained a lot of power. So ur saying ifi went, like 2" I'd experience morepower?
He's talking about a non-turbo car.
Old May 16, 2002 | 05:27 PM
  #8  
13BAce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,316
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by vosko' date='May 16 2002, 10:20 AM
my gtu with bonez cat passed with flying colors. probably helped that i had a giant vacuum leak :P
My 91 coupe passed. It has a bonez DP and high flow cat and a RB cat back.
Old May 16, 2002 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
sleeperRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 597
From: KAOH
Thumbs up

yeah a 3 inch exhaust is to much for a non turbo, if you had a turbo and were running more than 10 lbs. of boost then you would want a 3 inch exhaust, i used to have a 94 mitsubishi eclips GSX,it was the **** until i was stolen and wrapped around a tree, i had a 3 inch exhaust, bov, turbo timer, and a couple other nice,(NICE) goodies under the hood. only a turbo needs a 3 inch exhaust.ill shut up now i can talk about cars forever,piece!











waste ricers,all of them
Old May 16, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #10  
Powerpack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 233
Default

I want to put 3" piping only for downpipe to the high flow cat because I'm planning to go for a street port on my next project while rebuilding the engine. I thought free flowing the exhaust right now wouldn't hurt anyway. Why would it be a problem to suck the exhaust out, technically speaking? Would it be because with peripheral exhaust, the intake mixture could be suck in the meantime?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.