2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Got My Fc Tii! Finally! (pics Inside)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2003, 02:37 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Jims5543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Jensen Beach, FL / Sylva, NC
Posts: 2,934
Default

When its clean I like my Black TII a lot. BUT it is a PITA to keep clean. All I have to do is look at it and it gets dirty.



I love white TII's also I am especially liking them now that I have been looking at body kits. Plus white cars photograph better.
Jims5543 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 02:51 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

Originally Posted by Jims5543' date='Dec 8 2003, 03:37 PM
When its clean I like my Black TII a lot. BUT it is a PITA to keep clean. All I have to do is look at it and it gets dirty.



I love white TII's also I am especially liking them now that I have been looking at body kits. Plus white cars photograph better.
ive had a black, dark green, red, and now a lime green and another dark green car.



dark green doesnt look dirty until it gets dusty kind of dirty, black is always dirty, and my red seems hard to tell its dirty till i look close enough but then again the car is like 3 different shades of red.



my sister's had 2 white cars and when they do egt dirty, they are ugly.



kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 05:50 PM
  #33  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Default

Obviously, mazdadrifter, you never drove a Supra. Like I said, do not judge a car until you get to drive one. Supras are known to be fast only in straight lines because the god damn owners who only drag race. Supra's stock brakes are awesome. They can stop on dime. They are penalized in weight, but they have gobs of grip to make up for it. It won't be that fast in auto-X or tight track(esp with the laggy big-*** single turbos most modded Supras run), but on high speed tracks, Supras will rip most cars a new ones Drive one if you have a chance-properly modified one that is. Not with some Supra with 800rwhp, stock suspension, stock brakes, and tire sizes that are only good for drag racing. I only had springs, shocks, and upgraded brake pads on my ex-Supra, but it turned amazingly well. In stock trim, they are kinda on soft side but they still turn well and stop in incredibly short distance.



Sorry if I sound kinda mean. I used to own one and I love Supras to death. They are amazing machines. So when someone offends Supras although they never drove one or don't really know what they're capable of, I tend to get overly deffensive.
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 05:56 PM
  #34  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Default

Now that I think about it... holy hijacked thread batman!!!
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:11 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
mazdadrifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sunny South Florida :)
Posts: 1,963
Default

any decently modified car will handle better than stock. I just love it when people compare 13 yo cars with stock suspension and a boost controller, to 6 yo 30,000$ cars with 10k invested. Just the fact that they are being compared is proof that the 7 is a better car. Give me 30k and I'll show you a 7 that will out-do your tank in any way shape and form. except for curb weight
mazdadrifter is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 06:55 PM
  #36  
Member
 
1BadassRevvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Shifting into 3rd
Posts: 53
Default

looks like mine
1BadassRevvin7 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 07:23 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
g_dripht-alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: east meadow, new york
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie84' date='Dec 8 2003, 03:56 PM
Now that I think about it... holy hijacked thread batman!!!
agreed
g_dripht-alex is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 07:37 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Posts: 2,259
Default

Originally Posted by g_dripht-alex' date='Dec 8 2003, 09:23 PM
agreed
YOUR SIG IS WAYYYYYYY TOO ******* LONG





there is a garage option for this reason!
FrestyleFC3S is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 07:43 PM
  #39  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Rookie84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by mazdadrifter' date='Dec 8 2003, 04:11 PM
any decently modified car will handle better than stock. I just love it when people compare 13 yo cars with stock suspension and a boost controller, to 6 yo 30,000$ cars with 10k invested. Just the fact that they are being compared is proof that the 7 is a better car. Give me 30k and I'll show you a 7 that will out-do your tank in any way shape and form. except for curb weight
Dude... stop being ignorant... I know you love your 7 but both cars have their own strengths and weakness. But you're just being ignorant here saying Supras suck. They don't suck and they're great cars. Now, I'll stop responding to this "Supras suck! They're only dyno queens!" comments so stop hijacking my thread.
Rookie84 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 10:32 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie84' date='Dec 8 2003, 08:43 PM
Dude... stop being ignorant... I know you love your 7 but both cars have their own strengths and weakness. But you're just being ignorant here saying Supras suck. They don't suck and they're great cars. Now, I'll stop responding to this "Supras suck! They're only dyno queens!" comments so stop hijacking my thread.
he does have a point tho about how they get compared to 13 year old cars and still lose in some categories.



i have mucho respect for the 2jz's capabilities, and i think the mk iv supras are pretty nice, pretty chunky, but still nice.



also can someone explain WHY people put widebody kits on a supra? they're wide as hell stock.



kevni.
teknics is offline  


Quick Reply: Got My Fc Tii! Finally! (pics Inside)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.