2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Fc Pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 04:38 PM
  #31  
TurboSmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 353
From: Ft Myers
Default

damn tune that bitch. add some **** to it make it bad ***. lol
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 07:50 PM
  #32  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

baldy, it looks quite hard



j9....how does the turbo2 driveline hold up to that motor, and what type of turbo setup are you usings? -edit duh its stock-



torque readings pleez.....that is what matters you know...
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 08:12 PM
  #33  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Apex13B' date='Mar 28 2003, 05:50 PM
baldy, it looks quite hard



j9....how does the turbo2 driveline hold up to that motor, and what type of turbo setup are you usings? -edit duh its stock-



torque readings pleez.....that is what matters you know...
so far the driveline is sound as a pound its supposed to be good for 400+hp so i'm in good shape



mike
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 09:06 PM
  #34  
TurboSmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 353
From: Ft Myers
Default

are you using the stock TII rear end in it?
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 09:54 PM
  #35  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Mar 28 2003, 03:31 PM
ive got about 13k into the car, 10 of it was the 20b swap. it did 220rwhp@10psi right out of the box, it should do about 240rwhp@10psi, the engine is bone stock so 240 at the wheels is about 280flywheel which is what its supposed to have



mike
Great looking sleeper man. but I'm kinda confused.. if the 20B is suppose to do only 240rwhp@10psi.. why's it so much better than the 13BREW?
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #36  
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,097
From: Lynnwood, WA
Default

That is 240 @ the wheels. He said about 280 @ the flywheel. You can build the 20b to 500 - 600 reliable hp. How long would a REW last with that much power?
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 10:46 PM
  #37  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Mar 28 2003, 07:54 PM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Mar 28 2003, 03:31 PM'] ive got about 13k into the car, 10 of it was the 20b swap. it did 220rwhp@10psi right out of the box, it should do about 240rwhp@10psi, the engine is bone stock so 240 at the wheels is about 280flywheel which is what its supposed to have



mike
Great looking sleeper man. but I'm kinda confused.. if the 20B is suppose to do only 240rwhp@10psi.. why's it so much better than the 13BREW? [/quote]

its also got more torque



mike
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 10:49 PM
  #38  
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,097
From: Lynnwood, WA
Default

How much torque were you putting out when you dynod it?
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 01:13 AM
  #39  
BigTurbo74's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,315
Default

haha everyone is drooling



so i got a question too, was it a gxl when you started?

why you have t2 hood if it sucks so bad? where's the pics of the intercooler?



just post the infamous vids and we will all be searchin for the lube
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 01:17 AM
  #40  
Seppuku's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,723
From: Ky
Default

i think it started as a S4 TII.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.