2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Different Rotors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2004, 12:43 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rx7kid2gtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: netcong nj
Posts: 98
Default

I was reading in the mazda rx7 performance handbook that the 13b has a higher compression rotor than the 13bt



i was wondering if you were to switch the rotor from the 13b to the 13bt if the higher compression with the turbo would give you more power



i was also wondering if that would be a risky thing to do due to maybe ruining the engine by running too high of compression with boost
rx7kid2gtt is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 12:50 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Dramon_Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,784
Default

Higher comp gives you better off boost performance and less lag. But it also gives you less space to mess up in tuning compared to lower comp.
Dramon_Killer is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 01:45 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
turborotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LA, USA
Posts: 1,622
Default

Give you a boost in power but nothing to go crazy about. It did help with the non turbos between the s4 and s5 along with better breathing. The rx8 has the highest compression ratio to date, not mentioned on that book. If that's the book i'm thinking about, it has alot of errors, so becareful with it
turborotor is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 02:31 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rx7kid2gtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: netcong nj
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by turborotor' date='Feb 7 2004, 11:45 PM
Give you a boost in power but nothing to go crazy about. It did help with the non turbos between the s4 and s5 along with better breathing. The rx8 has the highest compression ratio to date, not mentioned on that book. If that's the book i'm thinking about, it has alot of errors, so becareful with it
the book i have is the mazda rx-7 performance handbook. is that the one you are talking about ?
rx7kid2gtt is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 05:23 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 925
Default

Why bother messing with NA rotors when you can just turn up the boost?

If you got the money and want to experiment with it, then go for it.

Else, it's a waste of time, because I dunno how much faster you want to go.

A stock turbo'd FC with full exhaust, intake, and fuel support is one pretty quick vehicle. 1st gear is over in a blink; 2nd gear is gone within two blinks.





-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 12:02 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by rx7kid2gtt' date='Feb 8 2004, 12:31 AM
the book i have is the mazda rx-7 performance handbook. is that the one you are talking about ?
yes, its poorly researched, and sloppily written, put it with your haynes manual...
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 01:43 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rx7kid2gtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: netcong nj
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by RETed' date='Feb 8 2004, 03:23 AM
Why bother messing with NA rotors when you can just turn up the boost?

If you got the money and want to experiment with it, then go for it.

Else, it's a waste of time, because I dunno how much faster you want to go.

A stock turbo'd FC with full exhaust, intake, and fuel support is one pretty quick vehicle. 1st gear is over in a blink; 2nd gear is gone within two blinks.





-Ted
but i was thinking that you could rin a lower boost and have ever be reliable. do you think that i would be a good idea?
rx7kid2gtt is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 01:56 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rmaiersg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: One hour north of chicago (Mundelein to be exact)
Posts: 811
Default

but i was thinking that you could rin a lower boost and have ever be reliable. do you think that i would be a good idea?


You won't see much gain if any that way. Just keep the engine alone. It'll be more reliable with stock internals especially if you're still using the stock ECU.
rmaiersg is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 03:51 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Originally Posted by RETed' date='Feb 8 2004, 06:23 AM
Why bother messing with NA rotors when you can just turn up the boost?

If you got the money and want to experiment with it, then go for it.

Else, it's a waste of time, because I dunno how much faster you want to go.



-Ted


Exactly my thoughts.
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 02-08-2004, 04:00 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
sidewinderx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 1,312
Default

my new s5 engine has s4 rotors in it. Plans to boost 20-25psi on it, less compression means more room for error when boosting.
sidewinderx7 is offline  


Quick Reply: Different Rotors



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.