2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Did some tunning on the fc....

Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #1  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

Put in about 2 hours worth of dyno time today....



First couple of runs were 120's pretty solid with 110's tq...



By the time I finished it was 134hp and I cant remeber the tq, I forgot to get the sheets.



Engine is pretty dang well stock, the guy that built it just cleaned up the ports and put good RA seals and FD corners in it, no 5th and 6th ports, they are completely removed, RB header modified to a 3 inch collector, three inch pipe to the axle then splits into dual three inch tail pipes. Tunning was done by myself on an SAFC with a wideband, also made some passes on the squeeze.... cant remember the numbers but I will have the dyno sheets up on monday....
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #2  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Completely removing the 6 ports messed up the flow and actually hurts power everywhere. With just intake and full exhaust, I made 128 whp at 5000 rpm on my 90 GTU. I was getting terrible ignition breakup above 5k, and the power completely fell off.
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

It seems to hurt the power down low, but up top I dont think it was hurting anything.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #4  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

Runs with and without the 50 shot....

Name:  bobby.jpg
Views: 19
Size:  74.3 KB
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #5  
Nateb123's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 143
From: Vancouver, BC
Default

Why remove the 5th and 6th ports? Weight savings? Because the system is pretty darn useful at cramming air into the engine for an application where you can't turn up the boost.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

I removed them when I put my built motor in, because the exhaust back pressure would no longer open them. I have wanted to do some of the things that I have seen to get them working again I just have not had the time to mess with it. Car runs great though I cannot complain, just kinda turdish below 4k in a high gear.
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #7  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

I will be re tunning for the 150 shot on friday... borrowing a pair of slicks and taking it to the 1/8th mile, that is if it doesnt pop on the dyno...
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

interesting what the no2 does...



imo 130rwhp is low, stock s4's will do 115-120rwhp
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #9  
fc3s4utnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 831
From: Greenwood AR
Default

The n20 woke it up alot, I had to pull the jets out to make sure it was a 50 shot.



But other than all of the ports just really being cleaned up it is stock, I am going to port match the manifolds and do a ported TB soon, we will see what that gets me.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treceb
ECU Discussions
4
Apr 5, 2004 08:28 PM
martel317
ECU Discussions
9
Mar 16, 2004 10:30 AM
l8t apex
Insert BS here
4
Dec 20, 2003 05:22 PM
Red12aRx7
1st Generation Specific
3
Oct 3, 2003 01:14 PM
turborotor
Insert BS here
12
Feb 27, 2003 04:47 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.