2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Almost time for boost

Old Mar 8, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #21  
One320B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 959
Default

So it is running now huh? pics man...geez. I don't believe you
Old Mar 8, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #22  
89TURBO2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default

nick....... i have to see it before you go..........



elliot..... very nice work..... now it is my 7's turn lol!
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #23  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

on the stock ecu?
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #24  
drunkin_idiot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,505
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='806934' date='Mar 9 2006, 09:46 AM

on the stock ecu?
Ya thats what Ide like to know.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #25  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Ignore the #10 run( the low torque run); I tried to have the dyno operator do a comparison versus the old SSA manifold and his old O turbine wheel and .81 turbine A/R versus my manifold and the new P trim turbine wheel and 1.32 turbine A/R, but for some reason a dyno showed up that I have no idea what its from.



Here are his relevant mods:

Rtek 1.7 ECU: new 550 primaries, new 720cc secondiares walbro 255lph hp and new 5/16 hardline from tank

HKS AIC 2 x 380cc

3.5" downpipe/midpipe to a modified Apex N1 catback

Cold air intake

No ac/ps/clutch fan

Water / Alcohol injection( intake temps start @ 22c and rise to 33C for this run)

Garrett B25 compressor section( 52 to4E basically I believe), P trim turbine wheel, 1.32 divided tang housing

Intake ports open slighly sooner than stock, exhaust is port matched to sleeve

Compression is low ( 60psi even both rotors, all faces)

* worn out drivetrain components are also have been taking a severe beating, making a lot of noise, probably hurting drivetrain losses.



This is an electric chassis dyno. I was told by the owner they have noticed results 10-15% lower than their neighbor shop with a Mustang Dyno, now whether thats true or not I have not confirmed.



Also after 6k rpms when the torque is dropping off pretty hard, we believe the car is being limited badly by the rtek 1.7 ecu's ignition advance, and probably the afm too.
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #26  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

Here are a couple of his previous dynos:

The lower torque dyno was:

SSA manifold, downpipe( 3" or 3 1/8") and midpipe to apex n1

B25 with O trim turbine wheel and .81 turbine a/r tang

Rtek 1.7( 550, 720), and a walbro 255 lph hp

afr's were in the 12s



The second run with the midrang torque jump was after

I made a water alcohol injection setup at the shop and street tuned his HKS AIC( 2 x 380cc )

Also fixed his cracked SSA manifold
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 04:26 PM
  #27  
t04tii's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Not bad for stock ecu
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pirate440
Meet and Greet
4
Oct 21, 2009 07:19 PM
drifterboy240
Meet and Greet
3
May 16, 2008 04:26 PM
FrestyleFC3S
Insert BS here
6
Feb 7, 2004 12:31 PM
WishIhadaRX7
Insert BS here
3
Aug 18, 2003 03:30 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.