13b turbo rebuild to 300hp or...
02-02-2007, 07:30 PM
#31
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by jwteknix' post='856845' date='Feb 2 2007, 04:49 PM
well you should be lol nah im Jk then your one step ahead
i got a buddy up here that has a brother in law that has a shop fro 35 bucks will let us tune anything we want within a day. thats not bad- to me.
what kind of engine manament are you guys using anyhow? for bang for the buck- (by the way - me likes cheap!)
02-02-2007, 07:45 PM
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,748
Originally Posted by blight' post='856965' date='Feb 2 2007, 09:30 PM
i got a buddy up here that has a brother in law that has a shop fro 35 bucks will let us tune anything we want within a day. thats not bad- to me.
what kind of engine manament are you guys using anyhow? for bang for the buck- (by the way - me likes cheap!)
megasquirt if you want to go cheap. just go to ECU discussion for any information. seems to be a strong ECU. it's kind of a create your own ECU.
or you can go to haltech.com. also have motech and wolf. but those get pretty pricey.
02-02-2007, 10:01 PM
#34
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by jwteknix' post='856991' date='Feb 2 2007, 07:52 PM
im using rtek 2.0 it works pretty i think its the bes bang for the buck work well for me and i have more then 300 whp ask your tuner friend what he perferrs to tune with
do any of you guys use daughter boards at all? rather then a stand alone?
02-02-2007, 10:06 PM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by blight' post='857036' date='Feb 2 2007, 08:01 PM
do any of you guys use daughter boards at all? rather then a stand alone?
thats the way it used to get done, but at this point theres a couple of problems.
1) nobody in the states does it
2) the wiring and stuff is usually pretty beat up by now, and then the stock sensors (afm...) are maxed out anyways...
02-03-2007, 08:33 AM
#36
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='857038' date='Feb 2 2007, 10:06 PM
thats the way it used to get done, but at this point theres a couple of problems.
1) nobody in the states does it
2) the wiring and stuff is usually pretty beat up by now, and then the stock sensors (afm...) are maxed out anyways...
well i know that is how it is done to the KA24DE-T guys with the nissans- 240sx. So how much are we talking for a piggy back or a stand alone fuel management system- other than mega squirt - i realy never liked mega squirt - from my understanding - and correct me if i am wrong BUT you are doing the ENTIRE ecu over again with mega- and then when it comes to other systems your not you are just doing the spark- the fuel/air- timeing- boost - ect. i would rather not mess with some of the more - cruelial aspects not with out a program to play with....
albiet is there a eprom chip in these ecu for the fuel at all? if so i could just chip it. i have done that with the fords and the dsms.
02-03-2007, 09:19 AM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wayne NJ
Posts: 1,440
for 300 whp all u need is a rtek chip but if you want adjusibility and tuning feature for more power i would go with rtek 2.0 it uses the stock harness and is vey easy to use but anything more then that i would go full standalone
02-03-2007, 09:37 AM
#39
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by jwteknix' post='857102' date='Feb 3 2007, 09:19 AM
for 300 whp all u need is a rtek chip but if you want adjusibility and tuning feature for more power i would go with rtek 2.0 it uses the stock harness and is vey easy to use but anything more then that i would go full standalone
got a link ?
02-03-2007, 09:47 AM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wayne NJ
Posts: 1,440