FEED exhaust = http://www.raynet.gr.jp/~se3p/Feed02.wav
AMUSE = http://www.raynet.gr.jp/~se3p/Amuse01.wav What do you think? https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...1047683329.gif |
Definately the amuse, I dig the low raspy sound.
|
damn... the feed link is down
|
no its not! when u click and the web opens fix the end of the link... from .wa to .wav
|
thanks man... sounds good, but i definately like the amuse more.
|
I think the amuse one makes 11.1PS on the dyno...according to rev-speed
|
go with the amuse
|
I likey dah amuse.
|
Anyone have a link to the feed and amuse websites?
|
Damn Im the only one that likes them both.
FEED just sounds a little quieter which makes me think further away from the muffler then the AMUSE, or better recording or just a louder sound, but I liked them both hehe ANYTHING is a DRASTIC change over stock hehe |
I like them both.. but I think the amuse has a bit of a better tone..
|
Originally Posted by JT-Imports' date='Sep 7 2003, 10:22 PM
Damn Im the only one that likes them both.
FEED just sounds a little quieter which makes me think further away from the muffler then the AMUSE, or better recording or just a louder sound, but I liked them both hehe ANYTHING is a DRASTIC change over stock hehe D-san |
JT, Any links to FEED or Amuse???
|
FEED http://www.pac-gate.co.jp/feed/index.html
Amuse http://www.webamuse.co.jp/partslist.html ENJOY!! Unfortunatly I havent heard either, I havent been out much the last few weeks, its busy busy busy here.... |
dang, that amuse sounds great, especially at idle. the Feed is a little too raspy for me.
|
The FEED is pretty good, more brappy rotary bad ass sound.
The AMUSE is definately deeper and quieter (more streetable). |
the same equipment was used to record both.
|
Originally Posted by DRFT' date='Sep 8 2003, 08:18 PM
the same equipment was used to record both.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands