Originally Posted by Travis R' date='Oct 16 2003, 10:27 AM
OK apparently there is a graph of what you are asking on page 454 of John Heywood's book "Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals". We should have a copy of it at the shop. So I'll take a look tonight. They are probably for non-turbo piston engines though.
|
Originally Posted by MaTT_FoULk' date='Oct 17 2003, 04:47 AM
That has what to do with the topic at hand?
|
Originally Posted by Travis R' date='Oct 17 2003, 04:56 AM
The book I mentioned wasn't down at the shop. Sorry I couldn't come up with numbers.
But a friend of mine brought up the point that there is only so much energy available because of the fuel. So assuming that you are getting a complete burn in your normal combustion cycle, the max chamber pressure should be the same as it is when it auto-ignites (detonation). The difference is that the auto-ignition will have a very rapid spike to that pressure, and the "normal" cycle will have a (relatively) longer build up to that pressure. That's just talk though. Data from the book could tell us something else. B |
Originally Posted by MaTT_FoULk' date='Oct 17 2003, 12:47 AM
That has what to do with the topic at hand?
|
Originally Posted by Hassan' date='Oct 17 2003, 06:56 AM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Oct 16 2003, 10:11 AM'] ah ok, so you know how fc's always have 1 borken engine mount? and its always the same one? i think when you drop the clutch it tries to twist the motor, too much twist = broken rear plate.
mike Well we are now using solid motor mounts on our cars (Mine and 87GTRs) [/quote] Same with me and mine never broke, either. Interesting. Maybe there's something involving torsional vibration here or some other field of physics that's well above my pay grade. https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...R#>/tongue.png On another note, I believe one reason why the passenger side mount disintegrates and breaks is because it's directly next to the turbocharger which radiates gobs and gobs of heat. B |
Originally Posted by Travis R' date='Oct 17 2003, 04:56 AM
The book I mentioned wasn't down at the shop. Sorry I couldn't come up with numbers.
But a friend of mine brought up the point that there is only so much energy available because of the fuel. So assuming that you are getting a complete burn in your normal combustion cycle, the max chamber pressure should be the same as it is when it auto-ignites (detonation). The difference is that the auto-ignition will have a very rapid spike to that pressure, and the "normal" cycle will have a (relatively) longer build up to that pressure. That's just talk though. Data from the book could tell us something else. mike |
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Oct 17 2003, 10:52 AM
[quote name='Travis R' date='Oct 17 2003, 04:56 AM'] The book I mentioned wasn't down at the shop. Sorry I couldn't come up with numbers.
But a friend of mine brought up the point that there is only so much energy available because of the fuel. So assuming that you are getting a complete burn in your normal combustion cycle, the max chamber pressure should be the same as it is when it auto-ignites (detonation). The difference is that the auto-ignition will have a very rapid spike to that pressure, and the "normal" cycle will have a (relatively) longer build up to that pressure. That's just talk though. Data from the book could tell us something else. mike [/quote] Shockwave? B |
Originally Posted by BDC' date='Oct 17 2003, 11:05 AM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Oct 17 2003, 10:52 AM'] [quote name='Travis R' date='Oct 17 2003, 04:56 AM'] The book I mentioned wasn't down at the shop. Sorry I couldn't come up with numbers.
But a friend of mine brought up the point that there is only so much energy available because of the fuel. So assuming that you are getting a complete burn in your normal combustion cycle, the max chamber pressure should be the same as it is when it auto-ignites (detonation). The difference is that the auto-ignition will have a very rapid spike to that pressure, and the "normal" cycle will have a (relatively) longer build up to that pressure. That's just talk though. Data from the book could tell us something else. mike [/quote] Shockwave? B [/quote] yah its the difference between a controlled burn and and explosion mike |
Flame front during detonation moves much faster than regular combustion, hence shock wave.
Combustion is a very fast burn VS detonation which is closer to an explosion. Like gunpower VS TNT. EDIT: Mike types MaD QUick yO! |
Oh, you mean kind of like what I said? https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...R#>/tongue.png https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands