Let's Talk Intake Manifolds.
#1
I'm looking for design help, pics mostly. Personal experience is good too
The goal is to make good power between 4000 and 8.500 rpm on TII running a t66 with low/moderate boost. Motor has bported secondaries, and extended primaries, exhaust is ported even with the sleeves.
Any input appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Steve C.
The goal is to make good power between 4000 and 8.500 rpm on TII running a t66 with low/moderate boost. Motor has bported secondaries, and extended primaries, exhaust is ported even with the sleeves.
Any input appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Steve C.
#3
Phew, that's a busy engine bay...
I've looked at the Racing Beat N/A setups. They're just big runners.
The 787 was N/A too, had the cool constantly adjustable sliding
intake runners. Nice, but not really my application.
Anyone got a pic of RiceRacing's intake, or any other jay-tech setup
for the TII? The 3-rotor OEM might hold some insights too...
Here's some pics of Bob Reiger's setup. Note there is virtually no plenum.
Pic's are big, so I'll just post one and send links for the rest - note the heim
joints holding the IC piping together... got boost?
Steve C.
Reiger2.jpg
Reiger3.jpg
Reiger4.jpg
Reiger5.jpg
I've looked at the Racing Beat N/A setups. They're just big runners.
The 787 was N/A too, had the cool constantly adjustable sliding
intake runners. Nice, but not really my application.
Anyone got a pic of RiceRacing's intake, or any other jay-tech setup
for the TII? The 3-rotor OEM might hold some insights too...
Here's some pics of Bob Reiger's setup. Note there is virtually no plenum.
Pic's are big, so I'll just post one and send links for the rest - note the heim
joints holding the IC piping together... got boost?
Steve C.
Reiger2.jpg
Reiger3.jpg
Reiger4.jpg
Reiger5.jpg
#8
mike: my info on Rice's intake was second-hand - read it somewhere amidst many
searches. I never found a pic of what he's running. I have great respect for his
work, and track testing A picture would be... worth a thousand words.
apex13b:
My car is designed for weekend street driving, and the occasional track event
('88 TII block, bp secondarys, extended primaries, moderate work in the runners,
ported exhaust, turbo TBD, probably 66mm@.70ar on the front and div/tang @1.15ar
on the hot side - plain bearing, water cooled). So, things like mixing efficiency,
charge velocity, throttle response, and so on, are factors for my application.
I'm now leaning toward a variation of Chris' design. He's on the right track.
I'm bolting-up the '88 manifolds to get going, and fab a new one to experiment with.
It'll take a while, but will dyno test and see what happens.
Thanks guys,
Steve C.
PS: If anyone spots a pic of Rice's intake, please post.
searches. I never found a pic of what he's running. I have great respect for his
work, and track testing A picture would be... worth a thousand words.
apex13b:
that is what all turbo intakes are...there are no gimmicks i
nside it...and it isnt needed..because its pressureized
nside it...and it isnt needed..because its pressureized
My car is designed for weekend street driving, and the occasional track event
('88 TII block, bp secondarys, extended primaries, moderate work in the runners,
ported exhaust, turbo TBD, probably 66mm@.70ar on the front and div/tang @1.15ar
on the hot side - plain bearing, water cooled). So, things like mixing efficiency,
charge velocity, throttle response, and so on, are factors for my application.
I'm now leaning toward a variation of Chris' design. He's on the right track.
I'm bolting-up the '88 manifolds to get going, and fab a new one to experiment with.
It'll take a while, but will dyno test and see what happens.
Thanks guys,
Steve C.
PS: If anyone spots a pic of Rice's intake, please post.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Angry Earl
2nd Generation Specific
1
02-10-2007 10:44 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)