Over dinner last night, a friend and I got into a discussion about being a slut.



We argued about which was a bigger slut:



A) A girl who has had 5 boyfriends, and slept with them all. This girl only dates them for a few months, then breaks up with them, and then goes to another from the stable of 5, switching amongst the 5 every other month or so, returning to them for sex, not to salvage the relationship.



B) A girl who has one night stands with say, 15 people.



My friend said that B was sluttier just from the numbers. I think that they are equally slutty. To me being a slut is being promiscuous, which is casual sex. My arguement is that choice A was still being slutty, because when she went back to the 5, she was only doing it for sex, not to rekindle their past relationships. To me, meaninglesss sex makes a slut, not the amount of partners. What do you guys think?



edit: and yes, by my definition, i am a slut.

They're both sluts. Can I have their numbers?

I'd say **** them both and call them a cab home from the motel. Maybe even at the same time if they are into it.

i would argue that the difference between a slut and a non slut is discretion. if you are discreet you can sleep with as many people as you like, if everyone knows who and how many people you slept with you could be a slut. it has nothing to do with sex, just how other people look at you.



mike

phin, can you make this a poll with A, B, or equal as choices? thanks

id say check for crabs

I would say girl A is manupulative, and likes to string guys along, while enjoying watching them squirm with slight hope that she will stay with them, only to enjoy seeing their pain when she leaves once more



girl B is just a straight-up ho



this statement takes into account that most people eventually want a stable relationship

thats a good idea



mike

y cant i make this a poll. and **** i wouldnt even call them a cab home, id make them take me to breakfast and id let em walk home

cause you can't just make a topic a poll.