|
Originally Posted by PhoenixDownVII' post='799853' date='Feb 6 2006, 12:56 PM
Never said they were the same age, but at the same time, U2's been around forever and they still have it. Boxrs (Ant Triangle): Bono's always been an activist, what's so new about that? I think their new album is pretty good considering how long it's been. Sunday Bloody Sunday is an old equivalent to Love & Peace (Or Else), he still sings about the same things, edge still plays similiar clean channel riff's, etc. But part of that is opinionated, and un-arguable...I just think they're still pretty good considering the stamina of most other bands. Yah, whatever. The state of their current musicianship aside, I'll always prefer the fun-loving lyrics of the Stones to the blatant political blowhard-ism of Bone-Oh and U frickin' 2. If I want political ******* commentary, I'll read the goddam op-ed page. |
Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' post='799891' date='Feb 6 2006, 01:44 PM
Yah, whatever. The state of their current musicianship aside, I'll always prefer the fun-loving lyrics of the Stones to the blatant political blowhard-ism of Bone-Oh and U frickin' 2. If I want political ******* commentary, I'll read the goddam op-ed page. i seriously doubt william f buckley and the national review is a better concert.... http://www.nationalreview.com/ |
bottom line is they need to stop playing, I dont give a **** if they care what I think or not, they are making themselves look bad. There IS a time to retire, and that time is now.
|
Originally Posted by nopistons94' post='799921' date='Feb 6 2006, 03:55 PM
bottom line is they need to stop playing, I dont give a **** if they care what I think or not, they are making themselves look bad. There IS a time to retire, and that time is now. they might keep playing just to piss you off, thats why they are not the beatles |
Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='799924' date='Feb 6 2006, 07:13 PM
they might keep playing just to piss you off, thats why they are not the beatles true the beatles never sucked |
I don't understand why they didn't get Detroit acts to play the half time show in Detroit. They have an entire genre named after them for Christ sake.
Even if they didn't want Motown, there's still a ton of people to choose from, anyone of which makes more sense than old men from England at America's biggest sporting event. Detroit people that would be a better choice: any Motown act, Bob Seger, Kid Rock, M & M, Madonna, Ted Nugent. (lol, maybe on guitar for Kid Rock) Who's picking the halftime show? The Stones (2006), Paul McCartney (2005), Justin Timberlake & Janet Jackson (2004)? Do ANY football fans listen to Timberlake & Jackson? Do any of their fans watch football? |
it draws in other people that wouldnt watch normaly or some **** like that for ratings
|
Originally Posted by nopistons94' post='799927' date='Feb 6 2006, 07:38 PM
true the beatles never sucked BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 YOKO fucked upped John's creativity and the VEGAN BITCH Linda, did you ever hear that whiney ass bitch sing? |
whoa, some pent-up hostility here
|
Originally Posted by banzaitoyota' post='799943' date='Feb 6 2006, 06:10 PM
BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 YOKO fucked upped John's creativity and the VEGAN BITCH Linda, did you ever hear that whiney ass bitch sing? yeah paul turned into someones mom! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands