NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum (https://www.nopistons.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (https://www.nopistons.com/3rd-generation-specific-18/)
-   -   Non-sequential Set Up (https://www.nopistons.com/3rd-generation-specific-18/non-sequential-set-up-17803/)

jspecracer7 05-27-2003 09:21 AM


Originally Posted by etown' date='May 24 2003, 09:56 PM
right i know it wont give me more power ,just trying to have more of a top end power band

Ummm...hate to burst your bubble, but your not going to get more top end HP out of a non-sequential conversion. When the stock sequential system finally puts both turbo's online, it's the EXACT SAME THING as a non-sequential setup.

FikseRxSeven 05-27-2003 10:20 AM

well i "thought" a nice powerband started with power at low rpm's and keeps good power til high rpms...... thats the only reason why i said that sequential might have a better powerband....... i never that seq. made more power....... plus you're not bursting any bubbles........ thats why i was asking if i was correct or not, cuz i wasnt really sure of the answer https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/bigok.gif







another thing that i had a misconception with(i think) didnt ....... after the primary turbos help spool the secondary turbo...... doesnt the second turbo take care of the boost the rest of the way by itself?

jspecracer7 05-28-2003 07:41 AM


Originally Posted by cmartinp28' date='May 28 2003, 12:20 AM
well i "thought" a nice powerband started with power at low rpm's and keeps good power til high rpms...... thats the only reason why i said that sequential might have a better powerband....... i never that seq. made more power....... plus you're not bursting any bubbles........ thats why i was asking if i was correct or not, cuz i wasnt really sure of the answer https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/bigok.gif







another thing that i had a misconception with(i think) didnt ....... after the primary turbos help spool the secondary turbo...... doesnt the second turbo take care of the boost the rest of the way by itself?

Hands down, the sequential system has a better power band. People switch to non-sequential for various reasons, primarily reliability.



Basically, the front turbo spools, then a valve inside the crossover pipe stays closed until the pre-control solenoid opens it up and then they both spool at the same time.



I'm not sure exactly if your talking to me though...since I quoted etown and not you.

BoOsTin FD 05-31-2003 05:58 PM

I have a question about non sequential setup. Those two solenoids for wastegate and pre-spool, Am i suppose to take the lines from the pre-spool solenoid and connect it to wastegate solenoid and plug up the lines that originally went to wastegat solenoid. Or just leave the wastegate solenoid connected and plug up the pre-spool solenoid lines?





thanks, sorry if i confused you guys https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub..._DIR#>/sad.png

BoOsTin FD 06-01-2003 12:05 AM

I forgot to say, I also have manual boost controllers (ball and spring type) installed in both wastegate and pre-spool.



Thanks

jspecracer7 06-01-2003 02:11 AM

You'll only need to connect the wastegate to the boost controllers, so you can cap the lines going to the pre-spool.

BoOsTin FD 06-01-2003 08:32 AM

And i can cap both of the solenoids too? Wastegate and prespool?

jspecracer7 06-01-2003 08:53 AM

if your using a manual boost controller, go ahead and cap both and disconnect both.

BoOsTin FD 06-01-2003 11:41 AM

cool, Thanks

etown 06-02-2003 04:37 PM

oh i sould most def. beat this supra it was a close race but i think once i set up the non-sequential turbos, pulleys i should be able to take him, my car is worked as far as you can go with the twins,besides the 30hp street port


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands