I was talking with a mazda performance tech recently. He told me that one of the ways you can make the stock turbo last longer and to be more reliable is to make it parallel instead of sequential. He says that the lag in low end is hardley noticeable and that the power kicks in harder in the high end to make up for it. Has anyone else heard of or tried this modification?

if your sequential turbos work fine. leave them that way. if your having boost problems then convert to non-seq. non-seq is laggy compared to sequential. you won't see a performance difference but you will feel it. if it ain't broke don't fix it https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/smile.png

Words to live by !!

i try to live by those. usual doesn't work that way. i fix one thing and find four other things that need to be fixed https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...1047683785.gif

just run your turbos till they die, then go for the good ol' big single upgrade

i try to live by those. usual doesn't work that way. i fix one thing and find four other things that need to be fixed https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...1047683785.gif[/quote]

umm ill be the first to call BULLSHIT on vosko



yes so 90% of his car was broke..

but the 2 sets of stock twins were fine..as well as the pfc...



everythign else ill let you slide on...no mullet motor,,but still you just try to find **** to get done..





https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/devil.gif https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png :thumbsup:

I was ******* around on the internet today and saw this on a web page. Its for switching (confusing) the turbos to work non-sequienal. I dont know if it works , or if it will mess your **** up, but i thought i'd post it https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png