NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum (https://www.nopistons.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (https://www.nopistons.com/2nd-generation-specific-17/)
-   -   Turbo Vs. Na Modified?? (https://www.nopistons.com/2nd-generation-specific-17/turbo-vs-na-modified-11457/)

InfamousReX 01-29-2003 10:03 PM

Hey guys....i've been debating this topic forever....and i'm still undecisive...granted that a T2 has alot more power and is obviously more responsive and faster....i'm having a trouble deciding wheather to save money and be carless for a while and get a turbo2 or carb. and modify my na....the whole problem is that a t2 runs for about 2500-3000 for a decent one around here and that if your lucky and actually find one....i have 1000 with me....i was thinking of carb. with some coil blasters on my na...or should i buy a 13b from the junkyard and port and rebuild that one.....i'm confused and looking for some help.... https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/dunno.gif

Racer X 01-29-2003 10:08 PM

Your car came with EFI might as well keep it then having to rip out the pump and regulator and other stuff.Heres some insight I hope will help you a bit.275 rwhp NA

rx7machine 01-29-2003 10:17 PM

Depends if you want the feel of the turbo or not.. I have an n/a and it's cool, but never driven a TII. If I were you I would just keep saving some money and wait until you find a good TII. Good luck. :bigthumg:

InfamousReX 01-29-2003 10:26 PM

RacerX: so your recomending a modified car./efi system with a port and mix and matching the motor itself??





Rx7Machine: i appreciate the advice...only thing that scares me tho is that i've been looking for a t2 for about 3-4 months and still haven't found one....so lets suppose i sell mine and get 2000 (highly unlikely) and add my 1000....then i would be stuck with no ride to work....no work = no money to play with....

j9fd3s 01-29-2003 11:27 PM

i like na batter than a turbo, its a lot easier to drive.



mike

rx7machine 01-29-2003 11:32 PM


Rx7Machine: i appreciate the advice...only thing that scares me tho is that i've been looking for a t2 for about 3-4 months and still haven't found one....so lets suppose i sell mine and get 2000 (highly unlikely) and add my 1000....then i would be stuck with no ride to work....no work = no money to play with....
Humm.. go with the n/a then.. he likes them too-->

i like na batter than a turbo, its a lot easier to drive.



mike

87RX7NA 01-29-2003 11:43 PM

I'm all about the highly modded N/As. Cheaper too, especially if you work on it yourself.

rx7machine 01-29-2003 11:56 PM


I'm all about the highly modded N/As. Cheaper too, especially if you work on it yourself.
Yea.. but something about turbos.. https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png ..is just great.

'79rx7 01-30-2003 12:28 AM

It's called boost, a highly addictive and a very costly drug!!!

rx7machine 01-30-2003 12:33 AM


It's called boost, a highly addictive and a very costly drug!!!
Oh.. that's what it's called.. :smirk: I knew it started with a "B"..lol https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/biggrin.png

Racer X 01-30-2003 02:25 AM


Originally Posted by InfamousReX' date='Jan 29 2003, 08:26 PM
RacerX: so your recomending a modified car./efi system with a port and mix and matching the motor itself??

With a hint of Zex mind you but yeah why not?You like the car don't you?

1Revvin7 01-30-2003 09:36 AM

get a t2.I wish someone would have told me this a while ago, its not worth the $$$ to modify an n/a.Unless you plan on autocross. I would have saved so much money.

j9fd3s 01-30-2003 10:57 AM

bridgeporto!



mike

pengaru 01-30-2003 12:01 PM

someone needs to do some serious intake experimenting with the NA 13B's, I suspect alot of the power gains in the renesis is in the intake.

FCmaniac 01-30-2003 12:08 PM

Yeah, boost is definitely addictive. I miss it but at the same time I love the reliability/simplicity/and cost of my NA plus I'm only interested in Autocross now. My drag racing days are over...... not that T2's can't be great autocrossers though.

StillInHighSchool 01-30-2003 02:53 PM

take a look at it the other way..im goin to tell you what i asked my mechanic when i first got into my new n/a.. he told me that while a tII can kick ass a modified n/a woudl be fast aswell and more dependable......not to mention sometimes turbos can go out real quik...neighbor hates rx-7s cause his tubo blew the same week he bought it new..and it was a gen 2...but i dont know **** myself..just telling you what ive heard...

Turbo II 01-30-2003 02:56 PM


Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 08:57 AM
bridgeporto!



mike

:bigthumg:

1Revvin7 01-30-2003 04:10 PM

Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.

j9fd3s 01-30-2003 04:39 PM


Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:01 AM
someone needs to do some serious intake experimenting with the NA 13B's, I suspect alot of the power gains in the renesis is in the intake.

i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike

pengaru 01-30-2003 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:39 PM
i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike

what about s4 vs s5, both na?

j9fd3s 01-30-2003 04:48 PM

oh i think the s5 upper is better than the s4, but i dont have hard numbers



mike

Racer X 01-30-2003 05:25 PM


Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Jan 30 2003, 02:42 PM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Jan 30 2003, 10:39 PM'] i think the na upper intake is a lot better than the t2's



mike

what about s4 vs s5, both na? [/quote]

I think for turbo applications the RE intake is the best upper intake I have seen for flow design stock.

j9fd3s 01-30-2003 05:44 PM

yah that and the fd are both good



mike

Slick92GS-R 01-30-2003 11:09 PM

darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..



the power i would say is from the bridge port, 105 octane, the balancing & electric water pump...(remember what i told u about those )

...he is very impressive though ..

Racer X 01-30-2003 11:21 PM


Originally Posted by Slick92GS-R' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:09 PM
darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..



the power i would say is from the bridge port, 105 octane, the balancing & electric water pump...(remember what i told u about those )

...he is very impressive though ..

Theres a link to that page thru the link to the thread in the engine and porting forum.Then theres Rotarymans ultimate NA 310hp engine idea.Nice maxed out NA with a hint of NOS. https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/BURNOUT.gif BTW nice location you have listed there.I love it when people brag they have Vtec and think they're fast enough to win a race.The sorry looks when they lose to someone else. :bigthumg:

rx7machine 01-30-2003 11:39 PM


Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.
I don't care much for "speed".. even though it did feel cool hitting 140.. what I really like is how "quick" the car is.. from point to point. That's just me though.

Slick92GS-R 01-31-2003 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by Racer X' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:21 PM
https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/BURNOUT.gif BTW nice location you have listed there.I love it when people brag they have Vtec and think they're fast enough to win a race.The sorry looks when they lose to someone else. :bigthumg:.... ..



i'm not quite sure what to make of that statement there MR Guru...



https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/dunno.gif

1Revvin7 01-31-2003 03:43 PM


Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Jan 31 2003, 12:39 AM

Speed is an addiction, you just want more and more, you can't get it fast enough while being n/a and there is a limit which you can reach quickly, that still isn't anywhere near enough. Well atleast this has been my experience.
I don't care much for "speed".. even though it did feel cool hitting 140.. what I really like is how "quick" the car is.. from point to point. That's just me though.

I don't care about going 180mph, just whipping the head back, thats what its all about https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...#>/BURNOUT.gif

twstdmtl 11-03-2003 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by Slick92GS-R' date='Jan 30 2003, 09:09 PM
darrell, here are the specs on that 275 hp fella ....



Phillips B-32, 105 octane

Engine 13b bridge port, 75' 13b rotor housings, '89 rotors & shaft, lightened & balanced, hardened stationary gears, carbon apex seals and oil baffle plate.

Intake Weber 48 IDA

Exhaust Custom stainless steel header, 24" primary, 3" main, DynoMax 3" in/out

Cooling 84-85 SE oil cooler, be cool radiator, Mezier electric 35GPM water pump (remotely mounted)

Ignition Direct Fire, Jacobs Rotary Pack..

The price of those mods would be pretty hefty. I have seen carbon apex seals alone go for 1800 USD.

sidewinderx7 11-04-2003 05:55 AM

you also have to remember, bridge ports dont exactly last too long, and they arent very ideal for a street car .. unless you like the 2k+ fluctuating idle. If you drive the car everyday, its a bad idea, i think anyways. You might want to.

1988RedT2 11-04-2003 08:01 AM

While its certainly possible to make an n/a fast, by the time you did, you'd have spent more than if you just went out and bought a turbo.



If you have a serious need for speed, buy a Turbo II.



If you want a fun, economical daily driver, buy an n/a.



And while there are exceptions to this rule, remember: The faster your car is, the more time its going to spend sitting in the shop getting fixed.



And most definitely: As the speed of your car increases, so does the rate at which money flies out of your wallet. There are no exceptions to this rule!

twstdmtl 11-04-2003 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' date='Nov 4 2003, 06:01 AM
As the speed of your car increases, so does the rate at which money flies out of your wallet. There are no exceptions to this rule!

You got that right!

relisys190 11-04-2003 11:35 AM

I'll go with N/A modded running a happy mid 12



And i'm NOT a drag racer either. It could be an extreamly balanced sports car still getting 15mpg



-Markus



"I love N.A."

DJ Blu 11-05-2003 09:26 PM

you sia d you need the ride to get you to work... so if you need reliability, you better go with the na. cuz turbo 2's as much fun and a fast as they can be are not as reliable.

1point3 11-08-2003 01:12 AM

I took a T2 with a downpipe

on stock ports with the 88 manifold



Bridgeports can have a nice 1000-1200 rpm idle with a tuned EFI system


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands