hey its your car man, do what you want, but if you put your pics up you have to be ready for any replies you get. are you goin turbo with this thing??
|
I dont know im kinda leaning toward the Cadmen SC, but I'm also planning on pickin up a turbo chassis and building the #@%$ out of it. The Ragtop is so damn heavy and its just an N/A engine, I mean if I could get the horsepower to weight ratio closer to 10hp per 100lbs It would be nice but either way, turbo, or SC, Ill end up spending a ton of time and money. I've still got time to deciede, parts are still coming in
|
Originally Posted by 89 Rag' date='Jul 15 2002, 12:17 AM
I dont know im kinda leaning toward the Cadmen SC, but I'm also planning on pickin up a turbo chassis and building the #@%$ out of it. The Ragtop is so damn heavy and its just an N/A engine, I mean if I could get the horsepower to weight ratio closer to 10hp per 100lbs It would be nice but either way, turbo, or SC, Ill end up spending a ton of time and money. I've still got time to deciede, parts are still coming in
|
Everyone sounds pretty tough wid all this attitude!! haha
https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/angry.png + https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/angry.png = :ph34r: |
Come on, the spoiler isn't that bad. There are definitely better ones out there, and I personally wouldn't have put it on there, but its not nearly as offensive as most of the ricer ****. I also wouldn't have painted over the taillight lenses, but then again, I'm a big fan of the way the lights look stock.
You should definitely do something with it to back up the look. I don't really like the Atkin's S/Cs because you can't keep the stock EFI system. Carbs seem so low-tech in comparison. With all the internal mods you have on the engine, you should totally go with a turbo. Slap a big-ass snail on there, and spin your way to heaven. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands