Auto N/a Fc's
07-20-2005, 02:48 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kincardine, Ontario Canada yeah Canada bitches
Posts: 1,068
i sure do have time slips and they suck for 2 reasons....
i have no traction at all wheel hop all through 1st and 2nd, 60' was 2.6 ish, i need to do the 5 bolt conversion, and it was like 100degrees, heat soak sucks and my mile anhour is more then you could touch.
i have no traction at all wheel hop all through 1st and 2nd, 60' was 2.6 ish, i need to do the 5 bolt conversion, and it was like 100degrees, heat soak sucks and my mile anhour is more then you could touch.
07-20-2005, 03:01 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Richardson Texas
Posts: 4,326
[quote name='rowtareh' date='Jul 20 2005, 01:48 PM']shane, your vert is sweet. trust me!
[/quote]
thanks a lot, i guess as far as bone stock verts go its pretty sweet. i still love it
[snapback]740590[/snapback]
[/quote]
thanks a lot, i guess as far as bone stock verts go its pretty sweet. i still love it
07-21-2005, 01:22 PM
#14
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
[quote name='Shane.Trammell' date='Jul 20 2005, 11:43 AM']thanks for the sympathy, i think its the third slowest 7
1st, auto 12a
2nd, auto s4 vert
3rd, auto s5 vert.
[/quote]
Just to set the record straight North American S4 'verts only had 5 speeds. No automatics.
1st, auto 12a
2nd, auto s4 vert
3rd, auto s5 vert.
[snapback]740585[/snapback]
[/quote]
Just to set the record straight North American S4 'verts only had 5 speeds. No automatics.
07-23-2005, 12:47 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: QUEENS NYC
Posts: 1,687
my auto FC was quick man i dunno what these guys are talking about. took her up to 138mph and she went up to 125mph with no hesitation . Form 125 to 138 it was rather slow.
My car is stick now and i notice a slight difference in acceleration. Not drastic
FCs are great man. Save a rotary. Auto or Stick
My car is stick now and i notice a slight difference in acceleration. Not drastic
FCs are great man. Save a rotary. Auto or Stick
07-24-2005, 03:42 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 403
[quote name='ROTARYROCKET7' date='Jul 23 2005, 12:47 PM']my auto FC was quick man i dunno what these guys are talking about. took her up to 138mph and she went up to 125mph with no hesitation . Form 125 to 138 it was rather slow.
My car is stick now and i notice a slight difference in acceleration. Not drastic
FCs are great man. Save a rotary. Auto or Stick
[/quote]
you need to drive or ride in a TII or FD to realise how slow a n/a is.
My car is stick now and i notice a slight difference in acceleration. Not drastic
FCs are great man. Save a rotary. Auto or Stick
[snapback]741869[/snapback]
[/quote]
you need to drive or ride in a TII or FD to realise how slow a n/a is.
07-24-2005, 05:18 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: QUEENS NYC
Posts: 1,687
[quote name='drftk1d' date='Jul 24 2005, 12:42 PM']you need to drive or ride in a TII or FD to realise how slow a n/a is.
[/quote]
well thats besides the point im comparing a auto to stick for a FC Na ,not a N/a to T2 or
an FC to FD, thats makes no sense for a comparison. Obvisouly a turbo FC is faster than an Na and a FD is faster than a FC (all cars are referenced to be in stock form)
Jason
[snapback]742174[/snapback]
[/quote]
well thats besides the point im comparing a auto to stick for a FC Na ,not a N/a to T2 or
an FC to FD, thats makes no sense for a comparison. Obvisouly a turbo FC is faster than an Na and a FD is faster than a FC (all cars are referenced to be in stock form)
Jason
07-24-2005, 11:11 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 464
i've driven cars that make FD's feel slow as ****. Its all relative.
BUT. Auto Fc's are slow relative to pretty much anything. They suck. I had an auto 91 vert. It drove me nuts. I loved getting over to the 5 speed when i got my hands on one.
BUT. Auto Fc's are slow relative to pretty much anything. They suck. I had an auto 91 vert. It drove me nuts. I loved getting over to the 5 speed when i got my hands on one.
07-25-2005, 08:15 AM
#19
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
hey now, let's not make this into a "turbo kicks NAs ***" type of thread.
there are quite a few modified NAs that will walk all over a stock TII, so yeah, it is all relative
it's all about what you like also. not much beats a turbo for power on a rotary, but the non-turbo has its advantages.
i tend to respect a fast NA more than a fast TII. it's a lot harder and you really need to pay attention to the details...
there are quite a few modified NAs that will walk all over a stock TII, so yeah, it is all relative
it's all about what you like also. not much beats a turbo for power on a rotary, but the non-turbo has its advantages.
i tend to respect a fast NA more than a fast TII. it's a lot harder and you really need to pay attention to the details...
07-27-2005, 02:56 PM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paterson
Posts: 29
[quote name='coldfire' date='Jul 25 2005, 05:15 AM']hey now, let's not make this into a "turbo kicks NAs ***" type of thread.
there are quite a few modified NAs that will walk all over a stock TII, so yeah, it is all relative
it's all about what you like also. not much beats a turbo for power on a rotary, but the non-turbo has its advantages.
i tend to respect a fast NA more than a fast TII. it's a lot harder and you really need to pay attention to the details...
[/quote]I heard a rumor that auto FC's are 4-port engines?!!
If so let me know cause there's plenty out there in the scrapper!!
there are quite a few modified NAs that will walk all over a stock TII, so yeah, it is all relative
it's all about what you like also. not much beats a turbo for power on a rotary, but the non-turbo has its advantages.
i tend to respect a fast NA more than a fast TII. it's a lot harder and you really need to pay attention to the details...
[snapback]742349[/snapback]
[/quote]I heard a rumor that auto FC's are 4-port engines?!!
If so let me know cause there's plenty out there in the scrapper!!